Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What does it mean when a Lama slaps your face?
A soft slap to the left side of the face?
Seems to me I once heard someone talking about this, but it was years ago and I didn't pay much attention.
0
Comments
Seriously, I have no idea what it means!
There's an old story about the Indian siddha Tilopa hitting his student Naropa on the head with a shoe - and him becoming realised as a result, but the events in some of those teaching stories are symbolic rather than literal.
.
Of course, like everyone else I've never heard of this except in Zen. As a Zen student you have to accept "odd" as a matter of course. Zen is anything but conventional, it cuts out our expectations and customs/traditions and gets to the heart of an empty reality.
Therefore I am not an expert on slapping.
If the Buddha wouldn't have done it, I don't think we can really justify it as "skilful means".
Really, you'd have to ask the Lama why. It could mean anything or nothing. There is no tradition of a soft slap to the face in any school of Buddhism I'm aware of.
http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/libel-and-slander
LIBEL AND SLANDER occur when a person or entity communicates false information that damages the reputation of another person or entity. Slander occurs when the false and defamatory communication is spoken and heard. Libel occurs when the false and defamatory communication is written and seen. The laws governing libel and slander, which are collectively known as DEFAMATION, are identical.
[B]A plaintiff who wishes to sue an individual or entity for libel or slander has the burden of proving four claims[/B] to a court: First, the plaintiff must show that the DEFENDANT communicated a defamatory statement. Second, the plaintiff must show that the statement was published or communicated to at least one other person besides the plaintiff. Third, the plaintiff must show that the communication was about the plaintiff and that another party receiving the communication could identify the plaintiff as the subject of the defamatory message. Fourth, the plaintiff must show that the communication injured the plaintiff's reputation.
There are four general defenses to slander and libel. Truth is an absolute defense. Consent by the plaintiff for the publication of the defamatory statement is a defense. Accidental publication of the statement is a defense. Finally, the statements of certain defendants in certain circumstances, such as lawyers, judges, jurors, and witnesses, are protected from defamation for PUBLIC POLICY reasons. This type of protection is known as privilege.
I had just finished participating in a guru puja led by this lama, was about to present the customary katah scarf and offering afterwards. He asked me how I was, and when I said I was fine, he smiled at me and gave me that slap.
However ... I had gotten mad at my husband before leaving the house to attend the puja. I thought I had gotten over my anger, but maybe the lama didn't think so.
I know this much ... it did not result in instant enlightenment. Confusion, yes ... enlightenment, no.
Jeffrey, I disagree; truth is not a defense in libel cases. And putting something up on a public forum certainly satisfies the requirement that the defendant is publicizing the libel. Every additional hit to a website counts as an additional libel. Shamar Rimpoche posted on his website that "lama" Ole Nydahl was misusing the Tantric teachings he'd received from the 16th Dalai Lama, and was using his students for sex (which was true). Nydahl threatened him with libel, so Shamar had to remove that comment and amend his post, even though he posted nothing untrue. People think the fact that accusations are true will protect them against libel suits, but it won't. But thank you very much for the post. I'm going to look into this some more.
We've really gone downhill as a society when we view temporary pain as highly offensive and to be punished, and aren't keeping in mind the highly unorthodox approach to life that Buddhism (Buddhist sanghas at least) offers as opposed to our traditional upbringing. Broken bones, actual abuse, things that are bad enough to require medical attention... would be another beast altogether.
Think of the teacher as the parent and you're the child. They're not going to abuse you, but they will do what they think is necessary to awaken your mind. You can leave anytime you want to... but should also respect that they are a teacher for a reason. That's my two cents.
Nor, as I mentioned before, have I heard offline of anyone being slapped in student-teacher scenarios in any Buddhist tradition.
.
Its not a buddhist concept, assault and battery, its a legal term. I am speaking as a united states person I don't know the customs of other places.
WE create abuse by having a concept of justifying it. For any reason. To that affect we are also responsible for abuse of children and women by husbands because when we create a culture where abuse is ok people get that message and the cycle continues.
The word "soft" seems to have been ignored in favor of the word "slap". We're bringing in abuse, assault, and misogynist concepts.
If there had been a mosquito on my face at the time, it wouldn't have been injured, let alone killed. Where is everyone's heads?
In my cultural expectation however I don't really want anyone to touch me unless I invite them somehow.
Might it have been better described as simply a pat on the cheek, rather than a "soft slap," then ?
Metta,
Guy
She says it is unusual to get this from a teacher. And that the left side of the face is thought to be directly connected to the heart center, and the slap (okay guys .. "light tap") cleans out the heart center. This could make sense, seeing as I have gotten angry at my husband earlier that morning (which is not usual for me). She says when it is given, it is always give to the left side of the face. She also said that it is very unusual for a lama to ask someone, on meeting them, how they are.
I have no idea if this is actually what happens. Just relaying information I received.