Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Examples: Monday, today, last week, Mar 26, 3/26/04
Welcome home! Please contact lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.

Awareness

UdoUdo
edited February 2012 in Buddhism Basics
Shunryu Suzuki said the frog is a good example for practice. Hit sits hours without moving ... then the fly comes along and in a fraction of second his tonque catchs the fly. Thats all. Is this the sprit of buddhist meditation. Is the frog conscious about himself - no I think not. When Subject and object unite then there is nobody who is aware, right? I wonder if there is a diffrence between Zazen and for example Vipassana. Looking forward to reading your lines :-) Greetings Udo

Comments

  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited February 2012
    buzz buzz

    Obviously it's not the topic of what kind of consciousness a frog has, like how they are aware as an organism.

    Ok reminds me to meditate, where's my lilly pad?

    I would be very interested to hear about differences between Vipassana and Zazen of course!
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2012
    There is a difference due to the point in doing it , though it can be slippery. Vipassana is Theravadin, and Zazen is Zen.

    In Theravadin Buddhism, the orientation is toward uprooting greed, hatred, and delusion, so as to first taste Nibbana (Nirvana) and liberation from Samsara, provisionally, in life. Then through ongoing practice to eventually realize Nibbana without remainder, and final liberation from Samsara.

    In Zen, provisional nirvana (with remainder) is realized through some very sharp and direct means. But then greed, hatred and delusion reassert. The practice is then not to uproot greed hatred and delusion, but to see Nirvana and Samsara as two sides of one coin, and then through further practice realize the "suchness" of that coin... ongoing.


    These are generalizations, and I am also speaking here specifically of Zen Buddhism in the second example, not Mahayana in general.


    Both the Theravadin and Zen paths are whole and complete, but at the same time different, which is very cool IMHO...... because we have a choice that is only our own to make. :thumbup:
  • haha

    we have the same example at home.

    when we put food on the table, one of my dog just stare at it completely still.

    we always joke around that he enters jhanas ;)
  • Shunryu Suzuki was a revered Zen teacher. Surely the image of the frog meditating and catching flies means something. About meditation.

    The flies. What are they? Thoughts? Desires? Disturbances?

    So what is the tongue in the example? And what guidance is the image of a tongue darting out?

    Is it a way to communicate with other frogs?
  • At one hand there is awareness in the Vipassana tradition. It means you are aware of yourself. You are aware of your breath. When you breath in you are aware that you breath in. There is a YOU (Subject) and there is a BREATH (object). This is the understanding of Vipassana.

    On the other hand there is awareness in meaning of Zen. Not YOU are aware of the BREATH but rather the YOU disappears and there is only Breathing.

    Both is Buddhism but opinions about awareness are diffrent, right?

    Greetings, Udo
  • Heres the thing.

    The buddha always asserts to look with mindfulness in one of the six sense realms.

    So he points to the ears meet sound and thus contact and sound consciousness arises.

    There is no subject, nor object because this process is dependently originated.

    This is visappana. The witness or assumed subject is just grasping. Thus when the light of awareness is shines in all six realms there is nothing to find.

    In seeing just the seen no seer.
    In smelling just the smell no smeller.
    In hearing just the taste no taster.
    In thinking just he thoughts no thinker.
    In feeling just sensation no feeler.
    In tasting just taste no taster.

    In zazen the same effortless meditation is done. Noises, smells, tastes, thoughts, all arise and fall. They are all disjointed and seperate. Vivid and empty.

    Same meditation.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2012
    Both are Buddhism, and I gave pretty succinct description of the difference between Theravada (vipassana) and Zen (zazen).

    Zazen, or at least the practice of Shikantaza in the Soto tradition of Suzuki, does not involved placing attention on any partuicular object of awareness such as the breath. There is the sitting form, but awareness is choiceless. In other words the "object" of awareness is the totality of your present experience, inwardly, outwardly, at-once. The distnction between an observing subject and an observed object resolves in simple awakeness. The breath is there, along with every other sensation, but no sensation is given more attention than any other. It is whole and at-once. That is sitting Zazen. This is why the attitude of Zazen is "nothing to attain", and "non-doing"

    :thumbup:
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2012
    ....and. regarding Zen in particular. If you want to practice, it is a really good idea to find a Sangha and a teacher representing a lineage. Suzuki's is a good one. They are not hard to find. 'Zen" is a very popular idea and there is a lot of pop nonsense calling itself Zen. So it is a good idea to be a bit conservative when looking for a teacher. ...if you are so inclined.
  • patbbpatbb Veteran
    edited February 2012
    At one hand there is awareness in the Vipassana tradition. It means you are aware of yourself. You are aware of your breath. When you breath in you are aware that you breath in. There is a YOU (Subject) and there is a BREATH (object). This is the understanding of Vipassana.

    On the other hand there is awareness in meaning of Zen. Not YOU are aware of the BREATH but rather the YOU disappears and there is only Breathing.
    it's the same with vipassana or samatha.

    at one point there is only sensation, or only breathing or whatever.

    choice less awareness just means the attention is place on a object we didn't consciously choose, but it's still an object.

    present moment, the totality of your present experience, are object as well.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2012
    Pat. I know your a vipassana guy from a way back, so speak about what you practice. i used to practice Theravadin Buddhism but do not now, so will only speak to what I am practicing, which is Shikantaza. Unless you are practicing Shikantaza Zen, don't project a vipassana view onto it. it isn't cool.
  • "When we perceive a mountain, the mountain is the object of our perception. When we perceive the moon, the moon is the object of our perception. When we say, 'I can see my consciousness in the flower,' it means we can see the cloud, the sunshine, the earth, and the minerals in it. But how can we see our consciousness in a flower? The flower IS our consciousness. It is the object of our perception. It is our perception. To perceive means to perceive something. Perception means thr coming into existence of the perceiver and the perceived. The flower tht we are looking at is part of our consciousness. The idea that our consciousness is outside of the flower has to be removed. It is impossible to remove one and retain the other."

    -Thich Nhat Hanh from "The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching
  • Pat. I know your a vipassana guy from a way back, so speak about what you practice. i used to practice Theravadin Buddhism but do not now, so will only speak to what I am practicing, which is Shikantaza. Unless you are practicing Shikantaza Zen, don't project a vipassana view onto it. it isn't cool.
    are you serious with this?

    if you are, you may want to re-read what i wrote.

    i speak of my views of vipassana and samatha, and how it differ in very important key aspect from the understanding of Udo.

    i speak of my understanding of choice less awareness, present moment and totality of the experience.


    i do not speak of Shikantaza zen.


    be at peace friend ;)
  • taiyaki. You are Zen guy no? for real and not just online? Then you know that is not practicing Shikantaza. I love the Thich as much as the next guy... .

    any how. nuff said.
  • RichardHRichardH Veteran
    edited February 2012
    If the thread is about vipassana and zazen, then I have described zazen and described how it is not the same a vipassana.. it is important to describe it effectively and I did. Thanks.

    ed. no disrespect.
  • I'm not reallly much anything.

    Both forms of meditiation are non doing. Everything comes and goes.

    Vipassana is the same but people mistakening assume that there is an observer and observed duality. The duality only comes together in the process of awarenessing. Thus most people are assuming the watcher or pure subject because of wrong view and doing vipassana wrong.

    True vipassana sees that the subject/object duality as an assumption and anatta is seen.

    It is a seal for a reason.

    Zazen is the pure expression of non duality. It just does what vipassana is supposed to do with correct view.

    But this is just my opinion. So take it for what it is.
  • JeffreyJeffrey Veteran
    edited February 2012
    Sticking the tongue out. VAM. Is a meditative experience. I don'think the tongue dart is bare awareness. Eureka!! All things go
  • I'm not reallly much anything.

    Both forms of meditiation are non doing. Everything comes and goes.

    Vipassana is the same but people mistakening assume that there is an observer and observed duality. The duality only comes together in the process of awarenessing. Thus most people are assuming the watcher or pure subject because of wrong view and doing vipassana wrong.

    True vipassana sees that the subject/object duality as an assumption and anatta is seen.

    It is a seal for a reason.

    Zazen is the pure expression of non duality. It just does what vipassana is supposed to do with correct view.

    But this is just my opinion. So take it for what it is.
    I'm sure whatever you are or aren't, your doing ok either way. Without flogging it further I'm being a bit of a shikantaza ass-hat because Zazen is very different than it looks from a common mindfulness perspective. I was taught "choiceless awareness" first by a Theravadin teacher , and although choiceless awaress can be used to describe Zazen up to a point, it is very different. I'll post something later about Shikantaza from a practice perspective... if it is of interest.

  • I'd love to hear your deconstruction of shikantaza.

    Please post!

  • OFF TOPIC:

    @taiyaki, may I suggest you to become part of a Tibetan sangha?
    Do you have any Tibetan temples around you?
    I think you really need to see a truly enlightened teacher...even one word from a true teacher will put you in the path...you might be awakened already ~who knows~but put yourself into test for your own benefit.
    I did recently...and I learnt some serious stuff about my delusions ... you just need a very good teacher, not a low ceiling one...
    A Tibetan Lama would know where you are right away... they are the real deal...
    You need more than experience and book knowledge , trust me, you need guidance from another person who went thru all the way...if you take this advice, you won't regret...
  • OFF TOPIC:

    @taiyaki, may I suggest you to become part of a Tibetan sangha?
    Do you have any Tibetan temples around you?
    I think you really need to see a truly enlightened teacher...even one word from a true teacher will put you in the path...you might be awakened already ~who knows~but put yourself into test for your own benefit.
    I did recently...and I learnt some serious stuff about my delusions ... you just need a very good teacher, not a low ceiling one...
    A Tibetan Lama would know where you are right away... they are the real deal...
    You need more than experience and book knowledge , trust me, you need guidance from another person who went thru all the way...if you take this advice, you won't regret...
    I agree and i've been looking. I'll go see one this sunday.

    Until then study, practice, and keeping ethics.

    Thanks for the suggestion. I've been thinking the same thing for a while. I need a solid teacher.
  • OFF TOPIC:

    @taiyaki, may I suggest you to become part of a Tibetan sangha?
    Do you have any Tibetan temples around you?
    I think you really need to see a truly enlightened teacher...even one word from a true teacher will put you in the path...you might be awakened already ~who knows~but put yourself into test for your own benefit.
    I did recently...and I learnt some serious stuff about my delusions ... you just need a very good teacher, not a low ceiling one...
    A Tibetan Lama would know where you are right away... they are the real deal...
    You need more than experience and book knowledge , trust me, you need guidance from another person who went thru all the way...if you take this advice, you won't regret...
    I agree and i've been looking. I'll go see one this sunday.

    Until then study, practice, and keeping ethics.

    Thanks for the suggestion. I've been thinking the same thing for a while. I need a solid teacher.
    :clap: :om: :bowdown: ~~~~~~~~~~~ :thumbsup: :wave: :dunce:
  • edited February 2012
    I'd love to hear your deconstruction of shikantaza.

    Please post!

    Me too, I've always loved a good shikantaza dissection.

  • Thanks for your lines .... I've practiced Zazen for ca. 7 years in the Soto-Zen tradition, sitting every day and one times a week I visit the Dojo its 25 Km (15 miles) away from where I live. There are two monks at the dojo, they are ready to help anytime but anyway I think it would be better to find a Master. For that reason I think about to accompany my sangha brothers to the next retreat. There I can talk to the Zen-Master. I'm not shure if I able to endure three day full of Zazen ... and what will happens to me. Until now I've completed a one day zen retreat :-) Greetings Udo

    By the way. One question according to my english language skills. Do you think my english is good to understand? I practice every day reading english books ... when I'm good enough I'm going to visit San Francisco and stay there for three weeks, also I want to practice there in the Dojo.
  • In Zen, provisional nirvana (with remainder) is realized through some very sharp and direct means.
    Interesting - could you give us some examples of these sharp and direct means?
  • At one hand there is awareness in the Vipassana tradition. It means you are aware of yourself. You are aware of your breath. When you breath in you are aware that you breath in. There is a YOU (Subject) and there is a BREATH (object). This is the understanding of Vipassana.
    I think with any breathing meditation the subject-object duality disappears once a sufficient level of absorption is reached.

    Spiny
  • seeker242seeker242 Zen Florida, USA Veteran
    I'd love to hear your deconstruction of shikantaza.

    Please post!

    Can I try? "Sitting on a cushion, breathing in and out, a bird chirps, a dog barks, it starts to rain". That's pretty much it!

    :)
  • @seeker242

    brilliant. the frog jumps. PLOP.
  • @Udo I understood your English very well. Good job!
  • But isn't the tongue catching the fly a habit energy, not concentration?
  • OK ... in a book I've read a Buddhist Vipassana teacher asks the question according to right concentration and wrong concentration. What is right concentration? For explanation he uses the example of the cat which is waiting in front of the mouse hole. OK, that cat is utterly concentrated but he says that from the buddhist point of view this is no right concentration. Why? No right concentration because the cat is full of wishes and desire. Greetings Udo
Sign In or Register to comment.