Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What drew you to your Tradition? What did you like about it? And what didnt you like about others?
What drew you to Zen or Tibetan Buddhism or Theravada or Nichiren buddhism. . . etc etc?
:-)
0
Comments
My choice did not rely much on comparison with others' activities. I was and am willing to credit that any discipline, whether inside or outside a designation like "spiritual," can get the job done if a participant exercises the determination not to "stop" or "nest" ...
Zen just happened to be my choice.
For me.. Buddhism is unique in one special way. Whereas Vedantic paths..and esoteric Abrahamic paths, seek union with the formless unconditioned Self or Godhead, Buddhism puts aside ontological reaching, and metaphysical musing, and points to Dukkha. Dukkha and non-dukkha.
Through the discipline of the 8fold path, there is a taste of non-dukkha and from there the unfolding of ongoing practice...free of doubt. This taste of non-dukkha is ineffable. The Buddha and those who followed him were uniquely skillful in this way. Zen.. has a "shut up and just do it" quality that works for me, being a stubborn mule.
Theravada and Zen are more "real" to me.
I do incorporate some Mahayana/Tibetan practices, because I enjoy them, but i'm not really too attached to anything in particular there.....
I was agnostic toward everything but I had only heard of a few things. I didn't find anything that made sense until I found Taoism. Studying Taoism gave rise to studying Buddhism which gave rise to studying Hinduism.
I could still have a bit of Hinduism flavoring my outlook but it isn't anything I'd have any faith in.
I try not to give any one tradition any more credence than others but I find my interest fades when I have to actually suspend my disbelief.
When I hear a teaching that comes from an understanding of the dharma such as Nagarjunas two truths, I like to go to the Theravadian(?) source to see if it makes sense to me or not.
I know the difference between Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism but I don't differentiate. I love Zen and Tibetan...
I think it is fascinating to see the development it all goes through.
I like the thoroughness and depth of the teaching. I'm not that into the ritual and deity aspect but no one's ever demanded that I practice them or even been the least bit condescending about it. There isn't much in the way of group meditation, aside from the odd retreat now and again, but I can do that on my own.
I once read about a western guy who went to study Buddhism. One day he met a great monk. The monk wanted to talk about Christianity, specifically, why the western guy wasn't a Christian. The monk said something to the effect of, "If I was born in America, I'd be a Christian, but I was born in Japan, so I am a Buddhist." The western guy went home and became a Unitarian, heavily influenced by Buddhism. It might be from a book called "Anthology of Western Buddhism" or something such. I'll get back to you all if I can figure out the source.
Good thread!
To start with I just went to my nearest Buddhist centre - it took a while to realise there were all these options....
And not a bad thing at all @porpoise !!