Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
I was never a huge fan of Oprah. I generally know her story and (apparently) how inspiring she is to many people, but her frequent endorsement of diet/spiritual/health fads and her self-indulgent "favourite things" segments usually make me roll my eyes.
She came into town this past week, and so the local paper has been publishing a few articles about her.
One particularly caught my interest. It was a bunch of quotes from her. Here's a sample:
“I know for sure that what we dwell on is who we become.”
“My philosophy is that not only are you responsible for your life, but doing the best at this moment puts you in the best place for the next moment.”
“So go ahead. Fall down. The world looks different from the ground.”
I couldn't help but notice how some of the quotes are more or less paraphrasing Buddhist teachings. It may not be so surprising since she rubs shoulders with people from all sorts of spiritual backgrounds, but it was a bit of a "maybe she's not so bad after all" moment reading that article.
Thoughts?
0
Comments
To be honest, I don't see those quotes as being particularly Buddhist in nature.
I think that overall, Oprah is a good influence. I think she brings a more positive message than most things on TV these days. She got people reading, got them interested in, and experiencing things they maybe never would have otherwise. She's ok. You just have to do with her programming as with all things-take what you can use, leave the rest and always use moderation.
I do find it interesting that you decided she might be ok because she sounded like she was speaking Buddhist language, so to speak. Nothing she said is any different from the hundreds of of FB memes that come through my newsfeed every day.
Pity there aren't more people in powerful positions like her I reckon.
The second quote is almost verbatim an explanation I've heard and read about moment-to-moment rebirth in Buddhism.
The last one is I suppose not strictly Buddhist, but it does echo the idea that, by giving up our expectations, attachments, and letting go of our egos a bit, we can learn a lot from life and be more at peace. I think the reason that many positive/self-help type messages can be construed as remotely Buddhist could be partially due to the watering-down/commercialization/whatever you want to call it of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Eastern spirituality that's been growing since the '60s and '70s. The feel-good, positive aspects of these philosophies (because who wants to hear about the cosmological, mythological, culturally/temporally irrelevant stuff) have been taken and stripped of any religious aspect, so it can appeal to a broader range of people.
I have qualms about this, but I suppose whatever helps people...
Also, I'm not saying Oprah is a Buddhist or that I'm a fan of her now because she's got some pseudo-Buddhist quotes. It's just that I've personally never really seen much from her other than self-indulgent commercialism and fad-flogging, so even to get a glimpse of how she may be (unknowingly) disseminating the dharma is quite interesting to me.
Even here on NB, I've seen people say "Oh you don't have to label yourself as a Buddhist, just live in a certain way" or "You can still be a (religious group) and a Buddhist" and stuff like that. If the dharma is so flexible, then what *is* Buddhism anymore?
If the dharma can be found in a watered-down version in secular self-help quotes, is that a victory for Buddhism, or is it problematic since people aren't realizing it's Buddhism (and what other morals/ethics/etc comes with the philosophy behind the self-help advice)?
@invincible_summer
You obviously haven't watched her show too often so perhaps best to reserve judgement on her
Never really thought about that before. What do you mean by that? But you're right, I shouldn't be too judgmental.
Oprah was the first regularly-scheduled talk show host to get away from a purely gossip and sensationalist format and cultivate inspirational themes. She started that "Angel Network", which inspired people to help others and work to make the world a better place. I think she deserves credit for that. Some of her topics are pure fluff, because that's what it takes to keep a broad audience, and maintain ratings. But she's also gone out on a limb by including acts of charity and spiritual themes, which was an innovative thing to do when she first started doing that.
And wow, talk about "everything she touches turns to gold"! I've always felt that if Oprah hadn't made such a big deal over Barack Obama's speech at the Democratic Convention whenever it was--8 years ago or so, history would have turned out quite differently. For better or for worse, but she really kicked his career into high gear.
I haven't seen her shows since she got her own channel. Is she still doing her shows? I thought she'd quit.
@Dakini summed up exactly what I like about Oprah. She made a decision to change her program from pure gossip in the early days (dreadful!) to a program that tried to help people and make positive social changes. Granted, at times it was still a bit fluffy and cheesey but I think she is genuinely a compassionate person and wants to help people.
I remember one program in particular where she had men who had been sexually abused talking openly about it. I don't know about the USA so much but this is still a topic that people aren't comfortable with in macho Australia.
That's why I like her...
The integrity to present ideas and people that other interests are trying very hard to silence. Some of us are living without Oprah or Opera on our screens. We need Sky. I will check if my sister has it . . .
Finding what we like, dislike, resonate with, are opposed to etc. offers great insight into ourself . . .
incidentally for UK viewers, the excellent, 'After Dark' debates are on 4OD
this was an often 3 hour on a sofa debate with experts, interested and interesting people . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After_Dark_(TV_series)
. . . maybe there is an Internet version now?