Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
You know, I have been really selfish, I just resently looked in to tibetan history more. I knew about tibet and china but I didn't look deep enough. It turns out that no one wants them. India, China, Bhutan. The Tibetan human rights are violated to those espically in tibet still. Then the self immolation of the TIbetans to protest for their human rights. It makes me extremely sad inside. How can you uproot a whole culture of enlightenment and tell them to go the hell? It just hurts unbelievibly. Even worse, when the dali lama dies, how are they going to know where to find him again?
This whole time I was not sure and dancing around the line on tibetan buddhism. Im sorry doesn't even come close.
1
Comments
moreover, how come you are putting India in the list of the countries, who do not care for Tibetians? Do you know where Dalai Lama and other Tibetians are currently residing?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=zQ1VvvrAILo
I guess I am full of mistakes, well I welcome you to judge me, everyone. I keep screwing up. I really don't even know what this site is for, I just try and see what happens. The more I mess up, The more I will know how to act, so there is always a bright side.
Where I give, I give to friends, these days.
::: cringes :::: Please, not again!
Don't feel selfish because you don't know about any specific group and their plight. Practice metta(loving-friendliness) for all beings everywhere in samsara who are born, grow old, grow sick, and die.
Interesting to think that whereas anyone might feel flummoxed and depressed by the fact that s/he cannot deal with the pain of the world (the endlessly mounting examples) ... still no similar microscope is aimed at the pleasures. It seems that pleasures are OK and can take care of themselves, but pain ... well, it's off to the races in an attempt to make things better.
Bit by bit, Buddhist practice addresses this convenient and socially-acceptable dichotomy. And there is nothing theoretical, philosophical or religious about it. Both positions (pleasure/pain, right/wrong, good/bad etc.) share a similar characteristic ... they're all about me. Characteristics are not something to chastise or elevate ... they are just characteristics. But Buddhism suggests a closer examination than is usually brought to bear.
Bit by meditation bit ... who is this one approves of pleasure and despairs of pain, who seeks to improve a world that seems stubbornly unwilling to be improved, who may be determined to 'help?'
There is nothing wrong with lending a hand, but without knowing who it is who lends this hand, I think there will always be some confusion and uncertainty.
Just my take.