Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Some questions concerning Zen?
Hello, everyone!
It's been quite a while since I've visted the forum, but with my recent spike of interest in Zen Buddhism I decided it might be helpful to come here and perhaps get some of my questions resolved.
1. Do Zen Buddhists believe in the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path, the Three Marks of Existence, the Ten Precepts, etc?
2. Even though Zen Buddhists don't place any emphasis on the importance of scripture, do they accept the teachings contained in the Pali canon?
3. Do Zen Buddhists hold that Zazen meditation is superior to other forms? If so, why?
Thanks to everyone in advance for helping me understand! Any answers are greatly appreciated!
0
Comments
Zen is deeply influenced by aspects of Taoism from what I know. Superior? Inferior?
Yin and Yang . . .
Anyway I am not qualified to answer being newly and merely enlightened.
I also feel there is a deep simplicity in Insight meditation, Zen meditation, Samatha etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samatha
:wave:
Honestly, I'm not trying to sound like I know much ( I clearly do not!), but, do some reading and you will soon discover that there is really nothing to it. So much nothing that it will overwhelm you.
Monks of course follow many more than that.
The "zen version" of the "noble 8 fold path" is generally considered the "perfection of the 6 paramaitas" They are very similar. You could even say that each is fully contained within the other. http://www.naljorprisondharmaservice.org/pdf/SixParamitas.htm Generally yes. Not necessarily but it depends on who you ask and how "technical" you want to get about it.
:om:
For tentative purposes, Zen guys and gals make use of what comes to hand. Scriptures, precepts, rituals -- all this a more like it are OK. I once asked my teacher about belief and hope. He said, "For the first four or five years (of practice), belief and hope are necessary." And after that, I asked? "After that," he said, "they are not so necessary."
There is no way to skip over or sidestep what is necessary. Everyone finds his or her own necessities, hopes, beliefs, etc. But with practice, the tentative nature of such things becomes more comfortably apparent. It's not a question of what's better and what's worse, what's wise and what's deluded ... it's just a question of what is actually relevant. Practice answers that question ... teachers cannot.
To hell with Zen Buddhism.
The real question is what you believe.
And yes although the Truth, the light and the way can be found in the "right " pair of shoes, this type of evangelism is really just about evangelists, not Zen.
1...Zen
2...No Zen
3...Wut Zen
Then I looked all the other types of Buddhism. Other religions too like Hinduism, Taoism, etc. Somehow I made the way back to zen about a year or two later and said "Yup, this shoe on the head thing is where it's at"