Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Is it true you can't feel the difference when your Enlightend?
I read today that when you are Enlightend you can't feel the difference so how do you really know you are?
0
Comments
and now back to the 'read all about it . . .'
If the statement is true maybe it is only focused on the insight aspect and not the tangential defilements.
But in your brains.
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn56/sn56.011.than.html
"And, monks, as long as this — my three-round, twelve-permutation knowledge & vision concerning these four noble truths as they have come to be — was not pure, I did not claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras, & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & brahmans, its royalty & commonfolk. But as soon as this — my three-round, twelve-permutation knowledge & vision concerning these four noble truths as they have come to be — was truly pure, then I did claim to have directly awakened to the right self-awakening unexcelled in the cosmos with its deities, Maras & Brahmas, with its contemplatives & brahmans, its royalty & commonfolk. Knowledge & vision arose in me: 'Unprovoked is my release. This is the last birth. There is now no further becoming.'"
Still good!
Because a Buddhist practice is a path of discovery of ever more subtle delusions, I think it is safest to simply think of enlightenment as an awakening that transcends the need to label itself.
Gradual enlightenment is a bit like 'Running Water'... Mini~ha-ha.
I am of the personal opinion that there is 'little enlightenment' and 'BIG Enlightenment'.
I further believe that BIG is impossible, without several predecessor littles.
But as, if and when you experience the BIG one - no more little ones either come along, or are necessary.
Enlightenment and Nirvana are usually the pair much discussed and analyzed as if their existence is just a right definition away from being manifested. I try to bypass most mental mastication's about them because of all the Ego wake that so often seems to follow such exercises.
Including "suffering" though in this group is surprising.
Is suffering not just dukka? Is suffering not just our meditatively observable attachment to any phenomena? Is suffering not just an isometric response of heart/mind to what ever we are unable to accept?
The only confusion that I see about suffering is just where folks can have trouble discerning the difference between pain and suffering. What were you talking about?
I might just be a little low on my morning caffeine!
Same with 'Enlightenment'. It can mean so many different things to so many different people, on so many different levels....
Have a coffee dearest!
Coffee is enlightenment. Profound eh?
:buck:
Does this shirt go with these pants? And you give me two option, five options.
Though I know there is a difference and I may have my preference, I can also admit that either way I don't care.
And its very much like that.
You just see the evenness of all things and brings a holy disinterest.
And at the same time everything is compelling equally.