Here is another basic question. I have read varying wordings of the First Precept. Some say "refrain from killing." Others say "refrain from harming any living thing." I am hoping that the real precept is the former, because I don't see how it is possible to avoid non-lethal harm to all living things. Plus, you couldn't ever defend yourself using non-lethal force. Any thoughts?
Comments
What the Pali says is
Panitipata veramani sikkhapadam samadyami
Which literally means " I undertake the rule of training to avoid striking down living creatures "
Pani is breathing..pata is striking down. Which arguably includes killing, injury, or torture..
In general the 5 precepts are fairly narrowly defined, but being so many practicioners like to up the challenge, so to say, Thich Naht Hahn has a fairly comprehensive version for the more committed modern practicioners.
I think a person can most certainly defend themselves without lethal force...
That said, as with all things Buddhist, there has to be a middle way, a common sense approach. Basically, do your best. Make improvements in the areas you are able to, and revisit often to see what else you might improve/change. Oftentimes, the attitude change is the biggest part; the actions follow when the attitude changes.
You will be able to tell within yourself if you are harming someone, or not. If it feels wrong, it probably is wrong.
The bodhisattva vow says to save all beings even if they are limitless in number.
So I think the attitude is to vow not to make a single mistake. And then when you inevitably do make a mistake I guess you resolve to bring your mistake to the path.
Ok, thanks everyone.