Best Of
Compassion in a dark world
HOW CAN I BE HAPPY WHEN THERE IS SO MUCH WRONG IN THE WORLD?
A wonderful answer by a Buddhist monk:
A man once asked an old Buddhist monk:
“How can I allow myself to feel peace or happiness when the world is full of suffering, injustice, pain, and chaos?”
The monk looked at him quietly and asked:
“If your house was dark, would you refuse to light a candle simply because the whole world is not yet bright?”
The man fell silent.
“The suffering of the world is real,” the monk continued. “But if you destroy your own peace completely, you may lose the clarity and strength needed to help anyone.”
“But isn’t being happy selfish when others are suffering?” the man asked.
The monk smiled gently.
“Caring about suffering does not require you to suffer every moment. Compassion needs a steady heart. When you are consumed by despair, it becomes harder to respond with wisdom.”
Then the monk pointed toward a nearby pond.
“When the water is disturbed, it cannot reflect clearly. But when it becomes still, everything becomes easier to see.”
He looked back at the man.
“The same can happen with the mind. A restless mind may react with fear, anger, or hopelessness. A calmer mind has more space for wisdom, compassion, and meaningful action.”
The man lowered his head.
“But the world still feels so heavy.”
“Yes,” the monk replied. “And that is why your peace matters.”
“Do not try to carry the suffering of the entire world in one heart.
Be kind where you are.
Help where you can.
Speak gently.
Protect what you can.
Reduce suffering in whatever small ways are within your reach.”
“A single candle cannot remove all the darkness in the world,” he said, “but it can still brighten the room around it.”
In Buddhism, happiness is not about ignoring suffering or pretending that everything is fine. It is about developing enough inner stability to remain compassionate without being completely consumed by the pain you witness.
You are allowed to feel joy while caring about the world. You are allowed to rest while others are struggling. And you can protect your peace not to escape responsibility, but to have the strength to meet suffering with greater wisdom and compassion.
The monk smiled one final time:
“Do not extinguish your own light because the world is dark.
Keep it burning.
Then use that light to make the small part of the world around you a little brighter.”
Jeffrey
Re: The Dark Side of Mindfulness
@Jeroen said:
Well, the article certainly is thorough in terms of gathering commentary. A lot of prominent members of the American Buddhist teacher community pass the review. But I’m still detecting a lack of acceptance that meditation could be anything but good. For myself, I long since determined that long stretches of meditation put unnecessary stress on my mind, and I started limiting meditation time to sessions of not more than twenty minutes.The thing is, these negative symptoms that meditation brings up could be hidden problems within the mind that are just surfacing. Osho warned about this back in the seventies, that the mind of modern man contained too much junk to just start meditating in a vipassana style. He advised a cathartic meditation called “the Dynamic” to be done for 3 to 6 months first. Perhaps he was ahead of his time.
What I find surprising is the amount of negative effects being cited; in some studies seven to thirteen percent of participants, in other studies a quarter. These are not minor numbers. That’s a lot of people.
...
Perhaps he was ahead of his time.
Or he just understood tradition. These things have been known about, its more that they've been forgotten or swept away in the transition to a secular, modern meditation.
In the more traditional circles I'm familiar with they don't just drop people into meditation. There's lots of study to understand the view, lots of preliminary practices. And to do long, solo retreats its way more of that.
In the modern context, when I've looked at 3-10 day retreats they usually do mention caution around pre existing mental health issues.
person
Re: The Manosphere and it’s anti-women sentiments
What was that great word of wisdom?
Oh yes!
"Put the toilet seat down before leaving."
Lionduck
Re: Just for fun: the random, useless announcements thread!
@marcitko
Ah, happiness resides in life's small victories.
After all, great victories are the sum of many small victories even as a lake is the summation of so many drops of water.
Peace to you
Peace to all
Lionduck
Re: Funny Stuff
Their absolute lack of empathy, lack of compassion, lack of humanity, abundance of greed, avarice, gluttony, and vindictiveness is infuriating as it results in massive pain, loss and suffering for countless millions in the US and offshore.
Lionduck
Re: Funny Stuff
I read about an Eskimo hunter who asked the local missionary priest, "If I did not know about God and sin, would I go to hell? "No," said the priest, "not if you did not know." "Then why," asked the Eskimo earnestly, "did you tell me?"
-- Annie Dillard
lobster
Re: The AI tsunami
Thought you might find this interesting. It is a more detailed examination of the claims the AI industry is making that AI might lead to human extinction.
Jeroen
Re: THE GREAT COMPASSION DHĀRAṆĪ - need help with pronunciation
Here is the simplified version...
lobster
Re: What documentary are you watching?
Abby Martin packs a lot into this 15-minute Double Down News / Empire Files video about the US war machine and its devastating ecological and environmental impact.
Abby was in Aotearoa at the end of July, where she hosted a sold-out screening and Q&A session in Tāmaki Makaurau (aka Auckland). Unfortunately, I was overseas at the time. Some friends did get to see her documentary Earth's Greatest Enemy.
Shoshin1
Re: The Manosphere and it’s anti-women sentiments
The mindset that if the man is making less than the woman, he is "Less than" still holds weight for men in our cultural psyche. That is changing, but is is a fear that men do have that their spouses, partners, will see them as lesser, that the women will seek "Hire Status" men, who's income is greater than their own.
The key to eliminating the fear, to eliminating the status issue is open communications. Both men and women must agree and understand, not theoretically, but fundamentally, that the relative income is not or ceases to be an issue. When both understand and agree that contributing to the relationship/family involves the entire relationship, of which, who make more is but an insignificant element.
Social climbers aside, a partnership, a marriage, is an ongoing dynamic relationship of constant give and take , of adjustments to ever changing circumstances. If relative monetary position is a serious issue, it usually means there are other issues, issues of trust, of communication, of fear.
The "Manisphere" or at least the part worried or complaining about financial status when the woman makes more money than the man, is usually the fear of loss of control.
They have been taught or bought into the fallacy that men are the sole providers, and or men must be the dominant, not equal, the dominant partner.
In the wild, for wolves, the Alpha Male and the Alpha Female are equal. The support each other and jointly lead and protect the pack. Birds share the burden equally of tending their nests and raising their chicks. They do not keep records of who brought the most to the nest. The y communicate, they coordinate, they work as a team.
In a culture that has been trained to equate income with worth and status, the trap is set, the fear real. Yet, when the female college professor marries the male truck driver, she remains a professor and he remains a truck driver. Neither is deminished by their economic reality, both are independent, both choose. They both "tend the nest" together.
The choose, in their own fashion, the middle way.
Peace to all
Lionduck