Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What can buddhism bring for those not necessarily "spiritual'"
Let me explain;
I know people are going to say it can eliminate suffering..
But im talking about the suffering who are not really searching for a path to eliminate 'suffering' 'per say' and are instead just wanting abit of inspiration whilst they are on there journey through life...
So i guess my point is; whats the difference between learning about buddhism which comes under "spiritual practice" and 'self help' books that are not necessarily "spiritual" but instead just gives us alittle inspirational boost for our lives.....
Is 'buddhism' really for people who have suffered and want to find a 'way' to remove their suffering??
If so or not, my original question comes back; what then, can buddhism offer for the every day guy who doesnt want to go to a temple or doesnt wantvto meditate or doesnt want to take refuge etc etc....
Do you understand what im asking?
I hope im clear!
Thanks in advance!
0
Comments
Buddhism 'has' spiritual practices like obviously 'meditation'
But 'eckhart tolle' power of now doesnt say we need a 'practice' and instead just open up to the 'now'
So whats the difference between the power of now and buddhism!
Ive seen an interview where eckhart says he isnt a 'buddhist' he is simply just awakened to the now!
So is there a difference like ; buddhism is spiritual and religious but power of now is more "smart thinking self help
My point is; what if someone doesnt want to be 'spiritual' but still find inner peace - if that makes sense lol
oh and of course all that comes with it, less anxiety, less medications, more true friends, happier relationships, etc etc.
In terms of worldly happiness, the Buddha specifically mentions "four kinds of bliss (or happiness)" that can be attained by a householder "partaking of sensuality" (i.e., indulging in a non-contemplative lifestyle): the bliss of having, the bliss of wealth, the bliss of debtlessness, and the bliss of blamelessness (AN 4.62). [The highest happiness in Buddhism, however, is a happiness born of renunciation (Ud 2.10) and letting go (SN 35.101) rather than one born of sensual indulgence (AN 9.41).] I don't honestly know all that much about Eckhart Tolle or The Power of Now, but if opening up to the present was so easy, nobody would need to ask how. What's the point of writing a book about it if all that's required is simply 'opening up to the now'? It sounds nice and easy to do; but I think it's a bit more complicated than that in actual practice. For one thing, even with an assortment of tools and strategies to help counter ingrained habits and ways of thinking that cause suffering, or at the very least aren't conducive to our experience of inner peace, it's quite difficult to be consistently mindful and aware in the present, let alone find true and lasting inner peace. How much so without any at all?
Buddhism as an intellectual or emotional bauble...
Buddhism as a way of picking up someone in a bar...
Buddhism as a really kool T-shirt...
Buddhism as a means of straightening life out...
Buddhism as a bliss machine...
Buddhism as a means of elevating your status....
Buddhism as a foundation for a predatory cult...
What Buddhism is or is not to someone else is not the point.
What Buddhism is to you makes Buddhism what it is.
Do I dare to say this is under all circumstances correct? Or to judge others for not believing the same? No to both. I believe all hold some truth in them. But only some.
I would expect the answer to be proportionate to the interest . . .
I would like to read a book without knowing anything about it, if you know what I mean . . .
:screwy:
. . . perhaps clarity of mind can be provided? :wave: