Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Yet another explanation is required by my dukkha ridden mind:
Te-shan was sitting outside doing zazen. Lung-t'an
asked him why he didn't go back home. Te-shan answered,
"Because it is dark." Lung-t'an then lit a candle and handed
it to him. As Te-shan was about to take it, Lung-t'an blew it out.
Te-shan had a sudden realization, and bowed.
Can anyone help me with this one??
0
Comments
The rest of the story is about how his intellectual approach breaks down in meetings with an old woman and with Lung T’an.
The day after his awakening he burned his comments in front of the teaching hall.
This theme is not new: Maybe a similar experience would be when we finally understand the Dharma and we are close to finishing “The Ultimate Book on Zen” in Word. And then the computer crashes and we have no back-up files.
Then the story says he met a woman who trampled on his carefully built mountain of words with a simple question. At the point in the story where Lung Tan helps, Te Shan was perched on the edge.
Koans are all about metaphor. What metaphor is the lit candle? What does it stand for? And by blowing it out just as Lung Tan hands it to Te Shan, what was the old Teacher trying to say beyond words to the struggling Te Shan?
The story goes on to say Te Shan burnt his collection of sutras that he had been lecturing from. Some Zen students get the wrong idea that the lesson is that sutras are bad. This isn't the lesson at all. It was that, at this point, Te Shan no longer needed the sutras.
Lung-t'an pointed this out.
Te-shan let go.
mind too.
I think he was showing him the similarity between enlightenment and the candle. When you're in the dark and are not able to see, you are afraid and are limited by your knowledge and experience of the terrain, because every step is a potential danger and
you cannot see things as they truely are at the present moment. But, when he lights the candle, even though nothing changes, he is no longer afraid because he can see the truth and can move about the world freely. But, all the teacher did was give him a glimpse and showed him the way. The rest was up to him to do. It was necessary for him to do it himself, so that he could always be able to see.
Its to do with the mind only concept. The darkness and light are external stimuli, impinging on the five senses, (sight here ). One can only distinguish the true nature of mind when we recognise that seeing is the same with or without light. The faculty of seeing in the dharma is based upon consciousness of the mind, namely the 6, 7 and 8 levels of consciousness.
We recognise sights due to our minds perception, the eye is but an organ which facilitates it.
It goes deeper than this, but this is the meaning for the above.
Its to do with the mind only concept. The darkness and light are external stimuli, impinging on the five senses, (sight here ). One can only distinguish the true nature of mind when we recognise that seeing is the same with or without light. The faculty of seeing in the dharma is based upon consciousness of the mind, namely the 6, 7 and 8 levels of consciousness.
We recognise sights due to our minds perception, the eye is but an organ which facilitates it.
It goes deeper than this, but this is the meaning for the above.
Out.
Job done.
"If you understand, things are just as they are. If you don't understand, things are just as they are"
Giving him the candle also set up an expectation....
and what do you do when the rug is pulled out from
under you?...aka..your candle gets blown out? Can you
keep walking through your dark? Has How said...can you
let go and get walking?
Have you let go of your fear of the dark?
'Be' wherever you are.
The only place is 'Here'
The only time is 'Now'.