Welcome home! Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site. New registrations
must be manually approved which may take several days. Can't log in?
Try clearing your browser's cookies.
Was the Buddha truly enlightened?
This question is primarily aimed at Secular Buddhists who reject or are otherwise skeptical of Buddhism's metaphysical claims.
Assuming Buddhist scripture can be trusted to accurately convey the original teachings of the Buddha, can the title of "perfectly enlightened one" rightly be given to someone who taught the existence of things like karma, rebirth, psychic powers, miracles, mythical beings and supernatural realms?
The bare fundamentals of Buddhism (the Four Noble Truths, the Eightfold Path, the Three Marks of Existence, Dependent Origination, the Five Precepts, etc.) all seem quite rational, practical and appealing to me; however, when I consider the more superstitious teachings of the Buddha, particularly his alleged journeys to mythical realms and his conversations with the supernatural inhabitants thereof, I can't help but assume he was either delusional or dishonest.
Of course, I could simply be wrong and all of these "superstitious" metaphysical teachings could be true. In any case, I suppose whether or not the Tathagata's supernatural convictions are true is ultimately irrelevant to the practicality of his philosophy.
What do all of you think? Do the metaphysical teachings of Buddhism cause you to doubt the Dharma or the Buddha at all? Do you believe one can rightly be called a Buddhist" while simultaneously rejecting the metaphysical aspects of the religion?