Welcome home! Please contact
lincoln@icrontic.com if you have any difficulty logging in or using the site.
New registrations must be manually approved which may take several days.
Can't log in? Try clearing your browser's cookies.
What do you think is the karma of a Buddhist monk who preaches hatred and violence?
Comments
I see the interviewer states: So what's with YOUR thread title?
Take jimmy saville for instance...
He went through his whole celebrity life doing horrible, hurtful things, and got away with it scot free! He died before it all Came out!
What we do will always have an 'effect', somewhere in the world ... But karma doesnt garantee 'what comes around go around'....
#i wish it did! There would be more peace in the world if karma really existed!
I suggest you study up some....
Im stating what karma is NOT!!
And no, karma (in the way 'others' believe it is, does NOT exist!
:whatever:
But neither of us knows the truth do we so no point having a debate about it on here! If the realms exist then hopefully he is in hell! But if not then he 'has' got away with it scot free!
Until we die, we wont know if these realms exist or not! Thanks for your imput though! X
Jimmy suffers as others suffer from his unskillful ways if he knew it or not. If one of us suffers, we all suffer because we are all a part of the same thing.
My honest opinion.
I obviously disagree but still respect your opinion!
I just cannot see (physically or mentally) how i would suffer just because you suffer...
When jimmy did his evil acts - he would have been loving it, the thrill, excitment, and pleasure of it! (Physically and mentally)
The children would have felt , confusion, pain, sadness, emptyness, (physically and mentally)
How does jimmy suffer?
How convenient for both religions to have similar cop-outs.
@zenmyste Just a quick comment, when you accentuate your sentences with a lot of !!!! it makes you come across as loud and aggressive. I actually cringe when I read your posts because they come across as yelling and that makes it a distraction to your actual words.
Sorry again! X
Going back to the original post, I think if you have a monk preaching hate and violence, there is going to be negative karma. The idea that we can figure out exactly what that negative karma may lead to...well, we can't. We can conjecture, but that is just an interesting discussion that doesn't lead to fact. But, then again, most of our threads don't lead to fact.
'Similar' yes.
Not the same.
The saying 'God works in mysterious ways' is generally unanswerable to a Christian because they prefer there to be a mystery around God. There are times when one Christian's 'God's Mysterious ways' is another's 'Well, actually it's obvious'...and can apply to all manner of different subjects.
The Buddha gave a limit of 4 different matters which he advised were unconjecturable. Just 4.
I know there are only four, because he said as much.
And we repeatedly debate them here.
Which is why it seems some discussions keep being aired and re-aired, pedalled out and recycled.... because they're the main 4 the Buddha told us it was pointless, airing.
What i do know is that the bible starts off by claiming that EVERYTHING IS GOOD, and then it spends hundreds pages trying to express that idea in detail, but never quite hitting the nail on the head. If its ALL GOOD, why all the fuss then? Because perception is a fickle and expression is limited. So it is for Buddhists, as well. We lack the tools to explain, but have all the tools to experience, and somewhere in that experience is a dose of karmic rendering, no matter how subtle or profound it may be. But if you start the story with: ITS ALL GOOD, shouldnt you also end the story there? So karma isnt really the judge of good or bad.... its the function of cause and effect. Good or bad are value judgements that have nothing to do with karma, because its already ALL GOOD. So the appropriate questions and answers are: What are the effects of this monk's actions? Even that becomes impossible to definitvely quantify..... and if you try to do so, more suffering for you.
And thats what the Buddha warned against: Dont suffer this line of thought!!!!!!!
you illustrate that well when you notice most threads don't lead to truth. The threads are the truth!
I see a lot of irritation and vexation when unconjecturables are discussed.
Well, less so now we stamp on them more quickly.
PS - To answer the OP, I think his karma will be to fall in love with an Islamic woman and give up everything for her, but then her family will forbid her to marry him and his heart will be broken. Karma is very ironic
It is xenophobia and racism at its worst.
In a western country, he will be imprisoned for hate crimes.
Unfortunately, Buddhist monks are revered in Burma, so he is able
to influence many people.
His karma will bring him more hatred and suffering.
I know that he is going further and further away from the Buddhist goal of liberation from suffering.
How are illegal imigrants causing terrorism?
Activist Aung Myaing of the Theravada Buddhism Dhamma Network said: "The Myanmar government should sue Time magazine. Buddhism has peace and equanimity as its guiding principle. Various organisations in Myanmar have strongly opposed the accusation issued in Time magazine."
Bad.
Karma is the results of previous actions. It cannot explain everything that happens to us. In fact trying to figure out the karmic reason for each thing that occurs is a hopeless waste of time. However, karma can explain, in general, why we behave as we behave.
Our behavior is conditioned by that which has come before. Our thoughts are our karma. Our likes and dislikes. All these likes and dislikes drive us from action to action, creating more karma, more causes for future results.
Out of this liking and disliking comes craving, which forges the grasping that conditions the next link in the karmic chain.
It is the clear recognition of the feeling of liking and disliking, without reaction, that cuts the karmic chain. Gradually we get so that we can watch liking and disliking with clarity. This clear seeing may be experienced as pleasant although the object noticed is unpleasant.
When awareness is strong, grasping is weak. When grasping is weakened, volition toward unwholesome actions has less intensity.
Effect = Vipaka.
There was an interview with him that I read this morning, and cannot find now. This covers some of it though.
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/11/19395152-buddhist-bin-laden-or-man-of-peace-monk-leads-anti-muslim-campaign-in-myanmar?lite
This one also is sort of a rebuttal against the Time article
http://thediplomat.com/asean-beat/2013/06/25/ashin-wirathu-the-monk-behind-burmas-buddhist-terror/
Nothing like good old American yellow journalism. Time hasn't lost its touch in all these years.
and killed in burma?