Nothing in the world is permanent, and we’re foolish when we ask anything to last, but surely we’re still more foolish not to take delight in it while we have it.
— W. Somerset Maugham, The Razor
To me this begs the question, what is delight truly? I recall when I was a child I used to delight in toys — Lego, marbles, plastic pistols. Those feelings have become very much less over the years, and I now have difficulty recalling when I last felt delighted about something. The very activity of play seems to disappear.
Buddhist monks let go of all possessions, including toys. The whole idea of possessing things, of being given something for yourself, is consigned to the wastebin. Somehow, on some level, this concept entered me when I started looking at the Thai Forest Tradition, it was like some part of the inner me that believed in modesty and frugality agreed that this was ultimately where I was headed.
It’s rare that you see older people who still delight in something. I will be 53 later this year, and I feel this draining of the spirit creeping up on me, a kind of drawing down of the energies of youth. I’d like to be one of those older folk who still have a sense of lightness, kindness, fun.
Jeroen
Dear all,
If I could summarise my last months, maybe years, I could say I've enjoyed quite a sensual and samsaric existence. For the past days I have managed to return to my meditation practice (twice a day, 30 minutes), sitting zazen. I still study / listen to Thai Forest Tradition monks and mingle it with Science and Western philosophy.
I have also started re-reading Dogen and last night after listening to Ajahn Punnadhammo's video on the Formless Realms I found the following video about the chapter Komyo from Dogen's magnus opus.
I followed Brad Warner's simplified reading while also reading Gudo Nishijima's (who by the way was Brad's teacher) and found myself quite lost. The only grasp I got from this text was that we are all Buddha's, we are all one, if you allow me this expression. This light within, isn't just a potential, it is our true nature. Many times I've spoken of violence being in our nature, but this is just a potential. This light, or so I understood, is something that goes beyond. However, I tend to attach to it values like kindness and goodness, which I sometimes think it is a very dualistic interpretation.
Anyway, I will link the video here.
Peace!

Kotishka
What a great synchronicity! I have re-taken zazen after lurking the sizzling samsaric sands...
May you all have a great day!
Kotishka
I'm reminded ....
North American archaeology agree that the first humans came to the Western Hemisphere during the Wisconsonian glacial period. Much of what is now Alaska and Canada was covered is thick ice. Traveling over that bare ice would be impossible.
A midwestern Archaeologist I knew proposed that it wasn't bare ice, but that the surface was more like tundra. His reasoning was that the climate was dry and dusty because the glaciers were sucking up all the moisture. Made things really dusty, especially with silts at the bottom of what used to be lakes and ocean. This dust settled on the glacier, which built up for centuries, eventually forming a layer of fertile topsoil. Over time, plants, and then animals, populated the region.
This was the land that the first peoples followed into North America, and it likely took hundreds of years. The followed the food and water. That's what they were there for.
This idea was met with derision, but since has gained a steady following, even though one crucial thing is absent - proof. No one uses words such as "likely".
Ozymandias
I met a traveler from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read,
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed,
And on the pedestal these words appear:
‘My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!’
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
The lone and level sands stretch far away.
— Percy Bysshe Shelley
Jeroen
Nothing in the world is permanent, and we’re foolish when we ask anything to last, but surely we’re still more foolish not to take delight in it while we have it.
— W. Somerset Maugham, The Razor
Jeroen
the book
Buddhism is not Zen. Mindfulness is not Zen. Zazen meditation is not Zen. Zen is a name that began with Bodhidharma and includes the Zen Patriarchs of China and the Masters that followed him, such as Huang Po and Joshu and the others in the Mumonkan, and even Tung Shan. They taught no practices, no means and no attainment. As Joshu said, "We are all Patriarchs now that Bodhidharma has come." The Zen conversation is characterized by several memes, one of which is the Four Statements of Zen. These memes have largely been abandoned by those who claim to be Zen Buddhists today. Other memes include Negation (no teaching, no attainment, no wisdom), Zen Dialogue or Dharma Combat, Conceptual Thought, and of course Sudden Enlightenment. The Sudden Enlightenment meme is one of the most ignored memes in Zen. The majority of those claiming to teach Zen Buddhism are preaching the Buddhist religion. They preach a path to inner peace, they preach mindfulness, and they put their faith in a practice called zazen sitting meditation. They claim this is Zen. What Zen Masters taught any of this? In contrast, even a brief review of the Zen Masters that we all agree are the beginning of the lineage, Huang Po, Joshu, Mumon, these old men teach no sitting meditation, no inner peace, and only a sudden enlightenment that does not rely on any means and cannot be attained through any effort. This book contrasts the writings of the old Zen Masters with those today who claim to be Zen Buddhists, but are not Zen.
@person said:
In learning what they think and why you disagree it gives you a better understanding of your own views.
Actually @ShanJieshi2 I’d go so far as to say “all views are bad”… the best thing to do with a view is to totally ignore it.
Jeroen