To me the most destructive thing about social media isn't purely the addictive quality, though that is bad, its the way that it incentivizes and brings out our more destructive and anti social emotions. In order to keep us engaged anger and disgust are more powerful drivers.
I've also more recently become aware of the impact superficial wealth influencers are having on kids and what they aspire to in life. Something like 1 in 5 children's answer to what they want to be when they grow up is just rich. Maybe this is a passing phase, the 80s was pretty materialistic too.
There is also this effect where since people can cultivate exactly what they want to see, seeing or hearing things outside that world becomes increasingly unpleasant.
person
Twitter is for the birdbrains...TiKTok is a ticking mindbomb...Instagram I've no idea what that is...
I only use fb and Whatapp to stay in touch with my family and friends who live miles away, eg overseas ....I have a YouTube account for posting short videos on here and to family and friends I also watch docos, old films and some news sites...
The most time I spend on the internet during my days off is on here...
Accessing the internet has become part of my daily life, but not to such extent that it becomes disruptive...In other words I still have a life...
I have cushion time twice a day, and check in on the mind's flow throughout the day off the cushion..
Everything in moderation...including moderation...
Shoshin1
The easiest way to measure the degree to which one is attached or addicted to social media is to just impose and stick to set limits of your use of it.
Here, I expect a thousand different reasons why each person can not do this in today's world.
If one ever really becomes serious about freeing oneself from its attendant sufferings, it helps when one can finally accept that our social media indulgences are simply the face of the Mara of our times.
My solution has been to try to limit my daily screen time from any electronic source to not exceed whatever time within that same day that I formally meditate. At least with this plan, I spend no more time indulging in this cause of suffering than I spend in freeing myself from it.
What was formally my pimp, can then become a half way decent meditation instructor.
Challenges beyond this though are how to not just switch from one form of Mara worship to another.
how
I never actually got involved in social media in the first place. Back when I worked in the UK, it was a useful way to keep in touch with colleagues, via LinkedIn and Facebook, but I was never very active on there. So I have accounts on which those old contacts are maintained but I’m very rarely on there.
I also keep a minimum of personal information on there, these places tend to get hacked every so often and so you can count on what you put on a social media site eventually ending up on the dark web. I’ve had highly personalised phishing emails being sent to an email account that I use for very few things. I’ve also noticed that Facebook has absorbed a lot of interest that used to go out to forums.
So yes, I would kind of agree that social media has largely become harmful. I use YouTube and WhatsApp quite a lot, and stay away from Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and so on.
My take on it is, as long as it is a useful communications device, smartphones and texting have a place, but I don’t think maintaining a social media profile is beneficial or necessary.
Jeroen
A timely topic for me, since I've been thinking about this same issue as of late.
Yesterday, I listened to a very interesting Freakonomics podcast. The guest-economist claims that there are goods - which we buy - but would prefer did not exist at all. His examples are luxury goods ("keeping up with the Joneses") and social media ("staying connected to friends and family").
According to his research, most people would PAY to have social media taken off-line for a month, where the main point is that it would be taken off-line for everyone. But most people would require to be PAID to have their own social media taken offline for a month ("blocked"). Hence, we have a case of FOMO, where most people would prefer social media did not exist, but they do not feel capable of quitting on their own. If the research holds true, that's a really interesting phenomenon.
Some additional thoughts:
That's it from me for now. I'll be very interested in what others have to say, especially about the ways&means in which we can overcome the negative aspects of social media, including the experiences of those who have maybe quit totally.
Hi all,
I've reached a point where I've become quite concerned with the state, influence and effect of social media on people in the world. Rates of anxiety and depression in our young population are rising. The engineers behind designing these social media sites have admitted they are designed to be addictive. The combination of social media with the development of the smartphone seems to have accelerated the problem. I'm not anti technology or anti progress but I've reached a point where I wonder if social media sites (we all know the main sites involved) do more harm than good. Has the balance tipped to their destructive properties outweighing the benefits? I'd love to hear people's take on their social media experience and outlook (whatever that take or view is - I'd love to hear it). As a Buddhist do you find it easier not to get trapped into the addictive pull of social media? Have you developed a level of mindfulness that protects you from being sucked into it? Anyone social media free entirely and how does that feel?
Love to hear people's experience with this. Thank you all.
P.S. I'm on the cusp of giving up social media myself.
I'm not so sure about that. Karate has its roots in Zen and Bodhidharma is said to have brought martial arts with his Zazen. He founded the first Chan school of Buddhism as well as the first Shaolin school. Many people forget about the Shaolin part though. There is much more to martial arts than just fighting.
[AN 5.41 - Ādiyasutta - Getting Rich]
“Householder, there are these five reasons to get rich. What five?
Firstly, with his legitimate wealth—earned by his efforts and initiative, built up with his own hands, gathered by the sweat of the brow—a noble disciple makes himself happy and pleased, keeping himself properly happy. He makes his mother and father happy … He makes his children, partners, bondservants, workers, and staff happy … This is the first reason to get rich.
Furthermore, with his legitimate wealth he makes his friends and colleagues happy … This is the second reason to get rich.
Furthermore, with his legitimate wealth he protects himself against losses from such things as fire, water, kings, bandits, or unloved heirs. He keeps himself safe. This is the third reason to get rich.
Furthermore, with his legitimate wealth he makes five spirit-offerings: to relatives, guests, ancestors, king, and deities. This is the fourth reason to get rich.
Furthermore, with his legitimate wealth he establishes an uplifting religious donation for ascetics and brahmins—those who avoid intoxication and negligence, are settled in patience and gentleness, and who tame, calm, and extinguish themselves—that’s conducive to heaven, ripens in happiness, and leads to heaven. This is the fifth reason to get rich.
These are the five reasons to get rich.
Now if the riches a noble disciple gets for these five reasons run out, he thinks: ‘So, the riches I have obtained for these reasons are running out.’ And so he has no regrets.
But if the riches a noble disciple gets for these five reasons increase, he thinks: ‘So, the riches I have obtained for these reasons are increasing.’ And so he has no regrets in both cases.
Bunks
Chuck Schumer calls on Benjamin Netanyahu to step down over war on Gaza in Senate speech
The fourth major obstacle to peace is Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has all too frequently bowed to the demands of extremists like ministers smotri and Ben gavier and the settlers in the West Bank. I have known Prime Minister Netanyahu for a very long time. While we have vehemently disagreed on many occasions, I will always respect his extraordinary bravery for Israel on the battlefield as a younger man. I believe in his heart, his highest priority is the security of Israel. However, I also believe Prime Minister Netanyahu has lost his way by allowing his political survival to take precedence over the best interests of Israel. He has put himself in coalition with far-right extremists like Minister smotri and benir, and as a result, he has been too willing to tolerate the civilian toll in Gaza, which is pushing support for Israel worldwide to historic lows. Israel cannot survive if it becomes a pariah.
Prime Minister Netanyahu has also weakened Israel's political and moral fabric through his attempts to co-opt the judiciary, and he has shown zero interest in doing the courageous and visionary work required to pave the way for peace. Even before this present conflict, as a lifelong supporter of Israel, it has become clear to me that the Netanyahu coalition no longer fits the needs of Israel. After October 7th, the world has changed radically since then, and the Israeli people are being stifled right now by a governing vision that is stuck in the past.
>
Shoshin1
Q: How do I go about teaching the mind to be peaceful in practice?
M: Whenever a thought or emotion of desire or fear comes to your mind, just turn away
from it.
Q: By suppressing my thoughts and feelings I shall provoke a reaction.
M: I am not talking of suppression. Just refuse attention.
Q: Must I not use effort to arrest the movements of the mind?
M: It has nothing to do with effort. Just turn away, look between the thoughts, rather than at the thoughts. When you happen to walk in a crowd, you do not fight every man you meet — you just find your way between.
(Questions asked of Nisargadatta Maharaj)
Jeroen