Last night I had an experience while I was half asleep… I was going to dig, into a great glowing mass, because “I wanted what they had”. It struck me this morning that this was an insight into the nature of jealousy, that it hangs together with the concept of possessing things, desire, my-making, and perceiving in others these things.
As soon as you acknowledge the idea of ownership, that things that you perceive are owned by people, then you embark on the journey of ego expansion through owning more, of becoming somehow greater because all these things are “yours”. You see that things are other people’s but not yours, and then you are inspired by a thought of how wonderful it would be to have them for yourself.
The truth is that there is no such thing as ownership, not even such a thing as ‘I’. The ego clamouring that it wants more, that it wants to be bigger by ‘owning the things outside itself’, that it wants to do whatever it likes despite the impermanence of the world, is just a shadow of desire, and itself casts off further shadows of jealousy and other darknesses. But the reality is that we do not really own things, we just use them for a while.
I find it so beneficial to explore these relationships… it is like by understanding the way they fit together, I can let go of them. For me, these insights and the working out of them are the true gift of the dhamma, freedom from the chains of the mind.
Jeroen
These are simple stories of how the basest of material attachments, that we think we've transcended, can still roam freely under any spiritual clothing.
The meanings of the "mu & kwatz" speak only of where others have awakened from the limitations of their own dreamed storylines. They are only meant to say to a seeker that anyone, anywhere, anytime can find their own awakening. They appear mysterious only to prevent other seekers from mistakenly trying to mimic a form of an awakening that doesn't apply to them.
To discover the mu or kwatz that applies to you, find the very attachment which currently owns you and that you can not yet address. Face it as endlessly & squarely in all its forms as you can.
When freedom from this attachment eventually becomes more important than all of the identity that it offers you, then your own "mu or kwats" or freedom becomes possible.
Here, the practice itself is the mu or kwatz of your awakening.
There are no shortcuts to such an understanding that I know of.
how
@PeterJTimm said:
Can we not be winners or losers at this game of life?
Indeed, the Buddha has advice directed at his lay followers on ways to manage finances and relationships for more favorable outcomes (winning).
Keep in mind though that winning and losing are among the eight worldly winds (gain and loss). And the ultimate path of Buddhism directs us away from that sort of mindset.
person
I like the analogy I've heard a few people state. That the human mind is still on version 1.0 but we're living in world 5.0. Biology moves at a much slower rate than culture and technology.
I think our evolution brought us to a state selected for life in small groups and immediate environments. Today there are so many people living anonymously, we lack that connection in most of our interactions. Our intuitions towards the world are well tuned for what is happening in front of us (our lived experience), but society is so complex and interconnected our intuitions break down and our experience often doesn't match up with actual trends.
person
I think we're still the same. The minds aren't fundamentally different and neither is the body. The difference may be more in how quickly information is processed and how fast events arise and fade. Kids these days don't even need to finish the tv show to know the ending or they assume the remainder of the story. Likely because they've heard about a dozen similar stories, a dozen stories that seemed similar but with a bizarre twist at the end, a dozen similar stories that are similarly aware the viewer knows of twists and feigns a twist but doesn't twist...and so on. We all know those jokes and phrases that once were new and are now so over-used it's like beating a dead horse until it's a really really really dead horse that's super dead. Ever been on the receiving end of one of those stories? It's a practice in compassion and patience. Probably similarly being on the receiving end of incessant rambling of a kid trying to explain their favorite video games.
In the days of yore you'd catch a line or two at the local water-cooler, take it home, share it with your family or friends, contemplate on it and laugh on it as much as a week later. Now a quick scroll through any major social media and you've got multiple "days of old life-times" of content in less than an hour. Everyone does.
It starts to create a different view maybe. Sort of a hive-mind effect? Like a scatter plot. The more inputs the more visible the trend becomes. Don't need to complete each point necessarily to verify. Enough people have done that already. Just like enough people have listened to a story and gone on a journey and reported their findings in their own unique ways. Collect the stories rather than take one yourself and find the pattern then grow from there instead. Of course without the first-hand experience or trust in someone experienced in the ways of the stories, this sort of short-hand understanding can be misleading but there are modern safeguards which with a little insight can be put in place as well to prevent that.
Something else that comes to mind, I think of both elephant and hummingbird living on the same earth and even though their experience of life and time is quite different, that doesn't change the properties in the world in which they both live nor the interconnected nature of it. Maybe one is seen for the differences, and the other too for the differences, but fundamentally I think the difference in the individual experiences of the world is less than initially thought. And maybe in the sharing of each view, there is less difference to be found than what is searched for. Furthermore, each contributing in their own necessary way to the overall health of the ecosystem which sustains them and others.
..I think I needed to write. 
Where'd you find the audio for that story, @Jeroen? I'd be interested in giving it a listen.
“My pacifism is an instinctive feeling, a feeling that possesses me because the murder of men is disgusting. My attitude is not derived from any intellectual theory but is based on my deepest antipathy to every kind of cruelty and hatred.”
― Albert Einstein
Jeroen
The world is much the same, but the noise in our minds is a bit different, and, perhaps, louder. More difficult to tune out, but that seems to be the task.
Fosdick
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Jeroen
If you see the illusion you are enlightened,
but if you think that you are enlightened
you are in the illusion!
~Papaji
Jeffrey