@Shoshin1 said:
Interesting....
Yes.
If a society stops worshiping God, they would, in fairly short order, find something else to fill the space left by the absence of God, and worship that.
Anthropology examines the struture of society/culture, and the function of the various components of the structure. Religion is one of those components.
If a component is removed, the structure is weakened. The term here is "culture shock". The cure to culture shock is to replace the lost component and its function. So, if the worship of God (religion), is removed, the society/culture's structure is weekend and could even collapse entirely. A replacement must be found, and in this case a new object of worship needs to be found.
My bias is to look at history through a sort of evolutionary lens. The reason so many large and successful societies had hierarchical and strict religions is a sort of survival of the fittest. It was one of the most adaptive strategies to maintain larger and larger societies at the time.
Its a different world today, we are much more educated, civil and prosperous. We aren't so reliant on such stories to maintain an ordered society. So all the negative tradeoffs that came with said religions are now much more of an unneeded weight.
So, I think I'm in general agreement with Jim Palmer. Though I'd quibble on a few points like #3, I'd agree that we are taught what is sacred and that different cultures teach different things. But we are all still human living in roughly the same conditions, so some things really are still sacred apart from culture. And #7, I do think humans are innately religious, or maybe spiritual, we look for some sort of greater meaning. I believe there is plenty of archeological evidence indicating our pre civilization ancestors thought in this direction.
person
Jim Palmer, writes:
"As you know, I once was an evangelical megachurch pastor and my pastoral career stretched over many years. Eventually, I could no longer teach my Christian doctrine with a good conscience and realized this teaching was not truly changing people’s lives… and so I walked away from the whole enchilada.
Below are 14 things that the misguided religious establishment doesn't want you to know. Speaking for myself and my personal experience, I was not able to see or admit these things to myself. I truly got into ministry initially because I wanted to make a difference and help people, and I relied upon the belief-system I learned as the proper framework to achieve this. It took a lot of post-religion reflection to see the ways this belief-system was hurting people.
I offer the below list in hopes that you might disentangle yourself from harmful beliefs and attitudes impacting your life.
14 things the misguided religious establishment doesn’t want you to know:
1. Toxic religion is rooted in fear, especially fear about the afterlife. It leverages the false doctrine of hell to win converts and demand holiness. The fear of God's disapproval, rejection, abandonment and punishment is another hallmark of toxic religion.
Clergy have no innate authority. Holding a church leadership position or having a theological degree does not imbue a person with special divine authority or superiority. The terms "anointed", "called", or "chosen" or titles such as "pastor", "priest", "bishop", "elder", "evangelist" or "apostle" do not confer any innate authority on an individual or group.
We hold sacred what we are taught to hold sacred, which is why what is sacred to one community is not sacred to another.
The stories in our sacred books aren’t history, nor were they meant to be. The authors of these books weren’t historians but writers of historical fiction: they used history (or pseudo history) as a context or pretext for their own ideas. Reading sacred texts as history may yield some nuggets of the past, but the real gold is in seeing these stories as myth and parable, and trying to unpack the possible meanings these parables and myths may hold.
Prayer doesn’t work the way you think it does. You can’t bribe God, or change God’s mind through obedience, devotion, or groveling. The underlying theistic premises of prayer are untenable.
Anything you claim to know about God, even the notion that there is a God, is a projection of your psyche. What you say about God—who God is, what God cares about, who God rewards, and who God punishes—says less about God and more about you. If you believe in an unconditionally loving God, you probably value unconditional love. If you believe in a God who divides people into chosen and not chosen, believers and infidels, saved and damned, high cast or low caste, etc. you are likely someone who divides people into in–groups and out–groups with you and your group as the quintessential in-group. God may or may not exist, but your idea of God mirrors yourself and your values.
Nobody is born Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Catholic, Protestant, etc. All humans are born Homo spaiens on planet earth. Our evolving species and planet are not innately religious. We are conditioned by narratives of race, culture, religion, gender, ethnicity, and nationality. If you were born in Nepal you are Hindu, if you were born in Nashville you are Christian, if you were born in Nazareth you are Jewish. People don't necessarily choose their religious belief-system, they are conditioned or enculturated into it. Christianity is not a superior religion just because it's your religion and you were born in the Bible Belt.
Evangelical theology isn’t the free search for truth, but rather a defense of an already held position. Evangelical theology is really apologetics, explaining why a belief is true rather than seeking out the truth in and of itself. All theological reasoning is circular, inevitably “proving” the truth of its own presupposition.
Becoming more religious cannot save us. Religion is a human invention reflecting the best and worst of humanity; becoming more religious will simply allow us to perpetuate compassion and cruelty in the name of religion. Because religion always carries the danger of fanaticism, becoming more religious may only heighten the risk of us becoming more fanatical.
1
Becoming less religious cannot save us. In fact, being against religion can become it’s own fanaticism. Becoming less religious will simply force us to perpetuate compassion and cruelty in the name of something else. Secular societies that actively suppress religion have proven no more just or compassionate than religious societies that suppress secularism or free thought. This is because neither religion nor the lack of religion solely nullifies our human potential to act out of ego, greed, fear, hostility, and hatred.
A healthy religion is one that helps us own and integrate the shadow side of human nature for the good of person and planet, something few clergy are trained to do. Clergy are trained to promote the religion they represent. They are apologists not liberators. If you want to be more just, compassionate, and loving, you must do the personal work within yourself, and free yourself from the conditions that lock you into injustice, cruelty, and hate, and this means you have to free yourself from all your narratives, including those you call “religious.”
Religious leaders claims that their particular understanding and interpretation of their sacred books should be universally accepted. Religious leaders often say, “My authority is the Bible.” It would be more accurate for them to say, “My authority is what they taught me at seminary the Bible means.” People start with flawed or false presuppositions about what the Bible is, such as: the Bible was meant to present a coherent theology about God or is a piece of doctrinal exposition; the Bible is the inerrant, infallible and sole message/"Word" of God to the world; the Bible is a blueprint for daily living. Too often religious leaders make God about having "correct theology." There are a lot of unhappy, broken, hurting, suffering, depressed, lonely people in church with church-approved theology.
If your livelihood depends on the success of your church as an organization, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that you will mostly define and reward Christianity as participation in church structures and programs. Christian living is mostly a decentralized reality or way of life, not a centralized or program-dependent phenomenon. Church attendance, tithing, membership, service, and devoted participation, become the hallmarks of Christian maturity.
You are capable of guiding your own spiritual path from the inside out and don't need to be told what to do. You naturally have the ability, capacity, tools and skills to guide and direct your life meaningfully, ethically and effectively. Through the use of your fundamental human faculties such as critical thinking, empathy, reason, conscience and intuition, you can capably lead your life. You have the choice to cultivate a spirituality that doesn’t require you to be inadequate, powerless, weak, and lacking, but one that empowers you toward strength, vitality, wholeness, and the fulfillment of your highest potentialities and possibilities.
I'll shut up now."
federica
If you want to know what's wrong with this world, it's in one word: Politics.
That title covers greed, corruption, fraud and complete and utter shame.
And that's just the current Government in the UK. For other Politics, see Russa, Israel and China.
federica
Q: The memory of my wonderful experiences haunts me. I want them back.
M: Because you want them back, you cannot have them. The state of craving for anything blocks all deeper experience. Nothing of value can happen to a mind which knows exactly what it wants. For nothing the mind can visualize and want is of much value.
(Question asked of Nisargadatta Maharaj)
Jeroen
10 Days??? The local weather systems around here are so variable that the only weather forecast you can trust is the one you are presently looking at through your own window.
how
I started sitting on zoom with a couple of other Buddhist leaning meditators when Covid started limiting their access to their own Sangha's.
I just plug in, twice a day, 24/7 for 30 minutes and silently sit with whoever is there. No homilies, chanting's, offertories, dedications or scripture recitations, are offered besides some saying so long when the 30 minute sitting period ends.
Coming into a sitting period late is fine, if done quietly. Each meditator just mutes their zoom call if their side of the sitting space is not quiet. Some sit with their screens off, some with there screens on. Sometimes this zendo zooming space might be empty and the most that have ever showed up is 6.
I thought this zoomed meditation would only last until covid restrictions to their own Sangha's ended but as long as folks keep showing up to share in the practice, I probably will as well.
It seems that following scheduled sittings in the midst of life's competing distractions can impart a noticeable inertia of its meditative graces to all of suffering's causes.
how
Group meditation, online or in persona, is probably one of the best ways to sharpen my practice. I have currently started sitting with a friend and taught him as much as I've managed to learn regardings to Zen and Buddhism. In reality, all this dense theory must be tasted or risk cerebral indigestion. He has some experience, having been in Nepal for quite a few months.
Method of choice for now: just sitting / some metta or dedications ("May all beings attain wisdom, may all beings be free of suffering, may all beings find the path towards the cessation of suffering")
Now...we have been studying the Brahmaviharas lately. He was taught mainly anapanasati, following the breath, transitioning to shikantaza was not easy nor extremely hard. In fact, we talked about how in just sitting the four dwellings are important to allow certain tranquility to allow being just there, at 100% if you permit the cuantification...
Now to finish off. Crude humour from the US but with a very good message:
"But you can forgive the world and its flaws and follow me there because you've still got a hell of a lot to see."
How are your group practices? Or are you a solo rider like I was?
Peace
Kotishka
Assholery knows no bounds. Imperial Japan, Tamil Tigers. And I believe Triratna has a bit of a reputation for producing less than stellar followers? I may be wrong about that, so correct me if I'm wrong, I don't want to badmouth a group if its unwarranted.
I don't really know this person, but I imagine if she's been fired for some extreme views or behavior that she qualifies as an extremist member of her tribe. I like the YouTube channel Jubilee, they do bridge building work and try to have constructive dialogues across divides. A recent one, sat former lefties with former righties. One prompt was about compassion, the jist their POV was that they each show differing aspects of compassion. On the left, they're more focused on protecting people from harms, on the right they're more focused on preparing the people to face and overcome harms.
That prompt starts at 12:29
person
Yes sadly this seems to be the case... I'm reminded of Dependant Origination "ignorance" and how one might voice an opinion /a belief even if the evidence says otherwise, they continue to spout their verbal diarrhea ...
Shoshin1