I watched the whole docu in the end, but found the incessant repetition of violent images from history to be hard to sit through. The images used over the actual talking points are more a history of the media coverage, so there’s a fair share of bodies and blood.
It makes me wonder why I have to know about a 1982 massacre in Israeli-occupied Lebanon and watch the images of that atrocity in order to understand that the Israelis in the US embarked on a program to control the media.
But the other thing to note is the basic bankruptcy of people’s ethics. Both the media, the marketing, the people who do the lobbying, the politicians, they are all motivated by money and not by honesty and truth. The days of the freedom of the press are long gone.
Jeroen
@person said:
I believe either now or in your past you were either an immigrant in America or are now an immigrant in the Netherlands.
I was an immigrant in the States, and have my experiences being part of a group in the communes where I grew up. I reckon I’m probably a bit too alternative to be considered a “solid citizen”, which is fine by me.
And, children in the experimental classroom rated themselves as significantly happier.
This is interesting to me. Maybe human beings are happier being part of a tribe.
Jeroen
@Ren_in_black said:
It's funny, I read all of these responses and it gets me excited about meditating.Then when the moment arrives, I don't want to.
Ah yes the two minutes of, “I don't want to be doing this”
Some people spend ages trying to work out if this is a meditation. It is.
lobster
@Jason, I really appreciate the insight. Capitalism is the macro version of everything that Buddhism guides people away from. It's craving and clinging on a worldwide scale. It's doomed to fail eventually, because all physical resources are finite, medicine's keeping old folks alive longer, and people happen to really enjoy making babies.
ScottPen
I think the main problem is most people become reactive beacons rather than critical and compassionate fellow beings.
The media feeds you excessive sensationalism and horror for their own benefit (clicks, reactions, viralisation) instead of thought and articulated conversation like I see here.
Strong points are made, opinions are contrasted, experiences collide; but keeping a good and fluent conversation, utilising logic, compassion, and explaining one's point rather than demanding one's point to be perfect and right...and...most importantly...both sides willing to discuss openly rather than resorting to the "you are with me or against me mentality."
Kotishka
As I've mentioned before, it saddens me that attacks are on the rise again, affecting both Jews and Muslims. Unfortunately, this was expected given the ongoing tensions. The actions of the Israeli government, led by Netanyahu, have contributed to the escalation,
It is crucial to raise awareness about alleged war crimes committed by the current Israeli government and the IDF against innocent men, women, and children. Silence in such situations can be perceived as complicity with the atrocities. Speaking out against government actions doesn't imply a stance against any specific group of people.
In situations where people oppose government policies, there are diverse views, and some may be extreme . This is a common aspect of democracies, where differing opinions exist.
For many years, the narrative has often focused on "Palestinian Muslim terrorists" and crimes against Israeli citizens, overshadowing the actions of the Israeli military in Palestinian territories. It's important to consider the complexities of the situation, including Israeli military activities and actions of Israeli settlers.
Recent events have shifted public opinion, with increasing awareness of Palestinian civilian casualties and evidence disputing some IDF claims. Independent sources, including reputable Israeli newspapers and eyewitness accounts, have provided alternative perspectives.
It is essential to differentiate between opposition to the Israeli government and its policies and anti-Semitism. Many individuals in the West who criticize Israel's occupation of Palestinian land are not motivated by anti-Semitic sentiments. Concerns for the safety of Jewish friends and family are valid, acknowledging that those in Western countries generally have state protection, unlike the Palestinian people in Palestine.
In times of conflict, the truth often becomes blurred, and extremists on both sides contribute to propaganda that fuels violence.
Shoshin1
@IdleChater, respectfully, I think that the biggest difference is 2500 years. My understanding is that the mind isn't 1 thing, just like the self isn't 1 thing. The mind is the concept which humans use to describe our experience of having a brain which is capable of metacognition, aka thinking about thought.
There are a few different methods of detecting and identifying neurotransmitters in the brain, the names of which methods I can read and pronounce but mostly not explain. Neuroscientists have tested the timing relationship between the emergence, duration, and dissipation of these chemicals, and the awareness of the "minds" which experience their effects. As a matter of fact, literally everything that happens in the brain does so before we become aware.
ScottPen
Looks like a face in the background, just above to the right ...nose brow and forehead ....
Shoshin1