Best Of

Trying to make sense of what I'm learning but not sure how to make it a question..

There is a do'er which I identify with as self but that do'er is just a part or a system among a bunch of parts and systems that is the body-mind complex. What the do'er does is a result of cause and effect. Parts and systems causing and effecting.

This do'er can still influence the parts and systems but it is not me any more than a bike's wheel is a bike. This do'er can get a little heady and absorbed in itself whilst doing its function. Taking more resources than needed. Taking them away from the other parts and systems and somehow getting tangled up into thinking it runs the show and owns things and has desires and dislikes.

The do'er likes to come along everywhere with those misapprehensions in tow. So when the eyes see, the do'er sees too. When the nose smells, the do'er smells too, when the hands work, the do'er works too. It doesn't have to, but it forgot that or is too infatuated with wanting to. Problem is, that do'er mucks stuff up for me. It mucks stuff up for the eyes, nose, mind, etc. It likes that sight, doesn't like that smell, is frustrated by that thought... What it likes goes away too soon. What it doesn't like lasts too long and it anguishes. But it doesn't have to. It chooses to or has forgotten how to not anguish.

So for me, I remind it. "Hey, you don't need to attend this one. You can go." So when the eyes see, it is less the do'er seeing through the eyes an object which it likes or doesn't like. It is more the eyes seeing the object. More than that, when the do'er leaves, the object of focus is all there is. When that is all there is, it can be seen/heard/smelled/etc more clearly than when the do'er comes along. When it can be seen/etc more clearly, it can be understood more deeply.

Is this right?

From the view of one zafu

Try thinking of how you, as an abbot of a monastery, would try to get long-term practitioners, to move along beyond the comforts & complacency that can arise after their grosser forms of attachments have been relatively addressed. One of the most basic aids to point out the way & dissuade one from lounging on one's spiritual laurels (from material attachments to spiritual attachments and then beyond both) is the bodhisattva vows.
Those vows really just say that there was, is and never will be a separate self that could experience enlightenment. Ultimately, this is not an act of accumulation so much as it is about renunciation.
The Bodhisattva vows are an underlying teaching to remind one of this truth

and while those actively softening their own egos can experience the Boddhisatva vows as a potentially transformative teaching aid, to the identity bound they will literally seem like an impossibility and a personal failing. Try considering the Bodhisattva vows as signposts pointing to the most direct route towards suffering's cessation.

Don't worry about it. Adopt it, if you're inclined, as a compass heading on a spiritual journey. Whenever you feel like you've strayed off course, check where its pointing and there at least will be an alternative direction you can decide to head towards, or not.

What do you think is a "self"? How could Enlightenment or Nirvana be anything more than an oxymoron for such an imaginary construct. How do you stop practitioners from simply substituting one attachment for another, like prisoners continually trying to do a make over of their own jail cell, and just show them the cell door that has always been open?