Best Of
Re: Should a Buddhist own a gun ?
Although I live in a country with an astounding number of firearms, I personally do not own a firearm.
Some people own firearms as collector's pieces. They will never be fired except in rare safe displays and absolutely not on a living being.
I know individuals who have firearms who only use them on approved ranges.
I must point out that, in certain situations, even martial arts are potentially fatal.
Again, it matters not the potential weapon, gun, bow, club, rock, hand or foot. What matters is not the potential choice of weaponry, it is the mind set of the individual.
a knife to an assassin is a deadly weapon while a knife to a sushi chef is an indispensable tool. Archers were the field artillery until modern weaponry took over the battlefields.
Now, we have bow hunters and, while bows an arrows can be lethal, competitive and recreation target shooting are the prevailing uses. In Japan, archery is stylized and meditative in nature. Their ritual of the archery is the point, the target is an afterthought.
I could go on with various examples, but these will suffice.
Again, as a Buddhist, it is intent and mindset that matters, not the specific weapon. With the proper intent and mindset, weapons become not-weapons. Tool of death and destruction become tools of mending, healing, teaching.
Peace to All
Lionduck
Re: My Dharma practice today
Yesterday, within the difficulties of poor sleep and anxiety/excitement due to moving, I practiced:
Right speech: especially with my mother. No need to take my troubles out on her. I screwed up once, but apologised, a.k.a. tried to make it right.
Not taking what is not given: my father gave me a small liquidity loan to pay for the movers. A small amount was left over. I typically might postpone paying him back until I 'feel like it' a.k.a. would not prioritise it highly. But I paid him back immediately, even though there was a lot of unpacking to do a.k.a. it slightly inconvenienced me.
Insight: I think it is safe to say that those around me would say that I already am moral/ethical. But when I look at the little things, there is so much room for improvement. And of course, when aggravated by negative emotion/thought, I too can be a vanilla asshole 😄
marcitko
Re: All Squares Are Rectangles...
It’s true that language has its limits. And it’s also true language can be twisted and utilized unskillfully or even maliciously. I think it all comes back to context and intention. Sometimes generalization or categorization is useful in a particular context. Taking the example of slavery and racism in the US. For two centuries, a group of people were the legal property of other people. The people considered as property were then freed, but the other people created new laws segregating them and preventing them from having equal rights. Eventually they became free of those laws as well, but were subsequently prevented from getting loans, buying certain homes, etc. There’s some easy ways to categorize these segments of the population to make it clear who each group is and which group had political and social power over the other. And we can say not all of one group agreed with the way things were and tried to change them. But if we’re intellectually honest, we’d also have a hard time time saying that those categorizations didn’t matter or have real consequences, especially when talking to someone who experienced those consequences firsthand.
It’s definitely admirable to judge each person by their actions, as well as viewing them as an individual rather than a stereotype or through a preprogrammed prejudice. But it’s also a skill to see patterns and privileges and injustices and the ways some groups benefit from the oppression of others in an effort to ameliorate that harm and imbalance.
Jason
Re: “502” error on this site
The “502 Bad gateway” error seems to be increasing again, I’ve seen it about 5 times this morning in just checking the front page and making a couple of posts.
Jeroen
Re: All Squares Are Rectangles...
I don’t agree with that particular example…. But my reasoning for them would be the same reasoning for me.
Here’s why. That persons life experience has usually only been seeing “them “ in that context. A context which is constructed by media, their social media feed, their like minded group, many other things.
When someone has a different experience, testimony, if you will… that’s what can change prejudices. That’s where the coming together can change minds and hearts.
MY personal experience is all kinds and types of people are up to no good. But… they gotta see that for themselves… and be open and ready to see it. A lot of folks arnt.
Vastmind
Re: All Squares Are Rectangles...
I’m responding to this post bec if I’m not mistaken, I was the last to mention Christians when I vented on the political thread. So, I feel poked, hahaha,
Recommended reading :
“Separation of Church and Hate”
By John Fugelsang.
You’re right, doesn’t mean all.
Reminds me of this saying…
Not all men, but always a man.
Not all Christians, but always a Christian.
Is it an oversimplified generalization? Yes.
Can it lead to inaccurate and harmful judgments, bec it ignores the full picture and/or nuances? Yes.
But there’s a point to it. It’s emphasizing something. What that something is, is different for different people.
And yes, I think I’m aware that this is a tendency of the mind. Have I mastered my mind? No. Do my life experiences shape those tendencies? Yes.
Vastmind
All Squares Are Rectangles...
Just something that has been percolating in my mind this morning. A logical framework that my geometry teacher in 10th grade taught that has stuck with me over the years and have found all kinds of places it applies.
All squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares. Another could be all Jedi are force users, but not all force users are Jedi.
I feel like there could be a lot more depth to go into but my mind isn't going there right now, maybe I'll add to it later.
person