Have you read " Going Home- Jesus and Buddha as Brothers" by Thich Nhat Hanh?
To me, the teachings of Jesus and Buddha compliment each other nicely until Yahweh comes up. Even creators may rise and fall in a beginningless universe.
The main thing is how we treat each other and the world.
i like my christ practice ,it serves me. the lords prayer is a good mantra: lord jesus, give us our daily bread, lead us not into temptation, and lead us to greener pasture. good karma reminder: you reap what you sow. The golden rule:treat others as you want to be treated. Christ walk is Buddha walk to my bodhi heart.
Dear Friends of the Maitreya,
... or Metta 'RayBurns' Future AI Buddha.
As we may know, orthodox Judaism is still awaiting Brian or some other Messiah, Jesuits are awaiting 'The Comforter', Islamists the Mahdi and Lobsters the landing of the flying teapot.
Meanwhile ... Using our current skill set, what can we prepare for our dharma descendants?
lobster
@33_3 said:
@pegembara said:The dhamma practice is that of letting go. That means the letting go of your thoughts, memories, stories, fantasies etc. They are not a reliable refuge since their very nature is impermanence. They are not what you are, truly.
In the case of dementia, it is more the taking away of those things rather than a letting go.
So perhaps one way to practice is to let go of them before they are taken away.
Be well.@pegembara could you explain how? thanks
Have you noticed that dementia patients have no worries or anxieties about their future?
They don't have any regrets about the past as well.
Isn't it one of the "blessings" of dementia?
If we want to also have a similar freedom from stress, we can't just lose our memories and worries at will without resorting to drugs and alcohol, which are only temporary and come to bite us in the end. The only way to do that is by way of mental cultivation, aka practice.
You don't lose your mind, but what you lose is believing that what your mind tells you is true.
To put in simply, you are not the mind, you are not your memories. Your memories live in you! They are impermanent and can be taken away. They are not you nor do they belong to you! They don't define you. If nothing truly belongs to you, then nothing can ever be taken from you! All the rest are just "dream-stuff".
I listened to the podcast today. She's part cultural anthropologist, so there was much discussion of some of the cultural differences between Tibetans and the west.
My personal journey listening to the interview was interesting to me. At first I remembered many of the things I really loved about TB, and then when they started comparing attitudes to western ones I realized how much I have adopted and internalized some of those views. I was heavily involved in my early 20s, a pretty formative time. Then I thought, since then I've listened and read a lot of western people espousing very similar attitudes and realizing since leaving TB and looking for a more western approach I've probably selected for those who hold similar views. Then I'm wondering when they were talking about a "western" mindset just how western is it really. Is the western mind really so homogenous? Are they really just talking about the cultural world they inhabit in particular? With my general interest in science there's a known phenomenon in the scientific community that the vast majority of psychological and sociological studies have been done on young, western, college students and probably doesn't reflect the larger human experience very well.
Anyway, rambling aside, I thought she was interesting and liked what she had to say on the matter.
person
It depends what you actually want. Often a religion presents itself as a source of truth, and you get taken in by it and become indoctrinated by the community and ritual, only to discover at a later date that what your heart really wants is to search for truth, love, freedom.
I grew up in the Osho communes of the 1980’s, and for me that was the beginning of a long spiritual path, with some pauses, which took me past Christianity, Osho, Buddhism, Advaita, and other places. Each new stop along the way gave me wisdom, sincerity and peace, and caused me to reflect with increased insight on what had gone before.
Sometimes it is necessary to let go of the old while moving forward with the new, but not always. Sometimes the old just lingers and things move in parallel for a while.
Jeroen
That's one of the most beautiful things I've seen you write, @Federica.
Appreciate the share.
silver
@Jeroen said:
Well, there is trauma and Trauma. Some traumas are so strong they shape people’s lives and intrude into the present. What most people have are background traumas, also important because they represent the most traumatic experiences of your youth but not intrusive. Both can be worked with.
I guess I think a different term for the small traumas of life would help. Like discomfort or anxiety, etc. Using the same term for meaningfully different things waters down the more severe traumas, it also elevates the stories we tell ourselves about the degree of hurt we experience.
I dislike the term ‘power’ because it’s actually not that, it just feeds the ego. I think presence is a better word, or perhaps groundedness.
In my metta practice I added a phrase, may all beings be confident, grounded and resilient in the face of life's hardships. I hadn't thought to use the word power, but all of those imply a sort of personal capacity. Though perhaps like the word trauma, power has different connotations depending on how its used and a different word would be better. How do you feel about empower? Or is that too close? Strength? Some connotation of having confidence that one has the internal resources to engage and overcome difficulty.
person
Well, there is trauma and Trauma. Some traumas are so strong they shape people’s lives and intrude into the present. What most people have are background traumas, also important because they represent the most traumatic experiences of your youth but not intrusive. Both can be worked with.
I dislike the term ‘power’ because it’s actually not that, it just feeds the ego. I think presence is a better word, or perhaps groundedness.
Jeroen
Dependent origination is a nicer way of explaining determinism.
Free will vs determinism
What we believe in is free will?
The choice that is made freely and willingly.
You are free to make a choice BUT you are not free from the consequences of that choice or non-choice.
Everything we choose to do is because we want the pleasure and don't want the pain.
When you choose not to eat that ice cream, was that really what you want or was it because you want to avoid the result?
Dependent origination takes into account of all the factors that led to that decision.