God is Comfort Food For Mind
And as most of us know, comfort food is not the healthiest thing for the mind to indulge in
Shoshin1
For your perusal and debate…
Gautama the Buddha
Lao Tzu
Mevlana Rumi
Jesus Christ
Chuang Tzu
Socrates
Diogenes
Bodhidharma
Kabir
…
Maybe people would like to add?
Jeroen
Well, it's not an argument. It's a simple response, disagreeing with your assertion.
Death is not "perfection". Rather, like all phenomena, death is conditioned, relying on birth to occur. Therefore, it is not perfection. It isn't even real. Just a part of the cycle of birth, old age sickness and death, that the Buddha taught to free us from.
Yes, a case of thoughts feeding feelings & feelings feeding thoughts .
Shoshin1
@Jeroen said:
@Vastmind said:
More of what Osho thought/said about something
. * rolls eyes *So @Shoshin1, what do you think about honour killings? There was a recent case in the Netherlands about a Syrian father and two sons who killed a young adult daughter/sister. The religious climate does shape people’s expectations and behaviour.
If you look at things like the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, or the Charlie Hebdo murders, or the rape incidents in Germany from Syrian refugees, there seems to be a lot of more extreme and more violent mindsets amongst these people. I can’t say I approve.
Honor killing, similar to female circumcision, is not something inherently Islamic and happens rarely. Have you never read the Old Testament, which has lots of killing for stuff like this?
So rape has never happened in the West by white people? So its the Islamic world and not the West that has a free internet full of pornography with debased sexual acts of gang sex?
So IDF soldiers were not really captured on video gang raping a Gaza man? It was a fake?
So one of the Hostages was not raped after she returned to Israel? This was just a fake media article?
What's ironic is these gang rapes are not common in countries like Syria but happen when foreigners turn up in the West. Possibly these refugees are naive, watch the Western internet and develop the idea gang rape is something normal in the West.
I would suggest you jump on a plane & travel to Iran before its destroyed by the West and its Wahhabi Allies.
@Jeroen said:
@Vastmind said:
More of what Osho thought/said about something
. * rolls eyes *Ok, ok. I didn’t know you guys objected. I will let it be for a while, although I do find him interesting, and he does get the ball rolling.
For the record, Osho did speak at length about the Sufi’s, often in glowing terms. But the fact is Islam has largely rejected Sufism, and has historically persecuted it’s saints, like Mansur al-Hallaj. And Osho came from a Jain family, not a Hindu one, so was never really concerned with castes.
So @Shoshin1, what do you think about honour killings? There was a recent case in the Netherlands about a Syrian father and two sons who killed a young adult daughter/sister. The religious climate does shape people’s expectations and behaviour.
Most of the rest of your points seem to be attacking Western standpoints, and shoring up Islam as a whole, and bringing in Osho’s reputation, without ever addressing what Osho said. Which is not really a sound basis for debate.
If you look at things like the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, or the Charlie Hebdo murders, or the rape incidents in Germany from Syrian refugees, there seems to be a lot of more extreme and more violent mindsets amongst these people. I can’t say I approve.
Just out of interest @Jeroen, who do you mean by “these people”? Are you referring to the two billion Muslims in the world?
If you want to compare apples with apples when it comes to violent mindsets, you need to consider scale, context, and power. Western powers have invaded, bombed, occupied, sanctioned, and destabilised numerous Muslim-majority countries over the past century, often with catastrophic civilian death tolls. These were not fringe actions by extremists, but official state policies backed by governments, parliaments, and presidents.
By contrast, terrorism carried out by Muslims, while horrific, is usually the work of non-state actors and widely condemned across the Muslim world. These attacks have caused far fewer deaths than those resulting from Western wars, drone strikes, sanctions, and occupations.
If we’re being honest, the most destructive and far-reaching violence, measured in lives lost and long-term suffering, has overwhelmingly come from powerful Western states, not from Muslims.
Over the past century, conservative estimates suggest that between 4 and 12 million Muslims have died in conflicts involving Western powers: through wars, occupations, sanctions, and their aftermath. Most were civilians.
Now compare that with the estimated 30,000 to 40,000 Western soldiers killed, and 5,000 to 6,000 civilians killed by so-called Islamic terrorists in the same time period.
As for Rushdie, Charlie Hebdo, and the attacks in Germany, yes, those were brutal acts. But they were carried out by a small minority and do not represent all Muslims. Just as we would not blame all Christians for the Christchurch mosque attack, or all Jews for the actions of Israeli forces, we should not generalise here either.
What happened in the Netherlands was horrific, but honour killings are not unique to Muslims, nor are they supported by Islamic teachings. These are rooted in patriarchal customs found in many cultures: Christian, Hindu, and secular alike. Framing this as a religious issue only feeds a harmful and misleading narrative, @Jeroen.
Shoshin1
I see myself in everything but every thing is not-self. I see myself in a tree but the tree is also sunshine, soil, water and everything else that is not a tree just like me. I am everything that is not me.
@Shoshin1 said:
I found the video leans on generalisations rather than evidence, with claims more inspirational than factual. When you catch yourself thinking “That’s so me”, perhaps we’re not so special after all. Some people are more intuitive than others, but it’s nothing special. Intuition isn’t a constant gift, it arrives unexpectedly, more as a feeling than a thought, without consciously knowing why. Science would say the same: intuition comes from the brain drawing on patterns and experiences outside our mundane awareness.
Yeah, I've moved away from Myers-Briggs in general and towards the Big 5 in categorizing personality largely because of the science (or lack thereof) behind it. The Big 5 is what psychology researchers use.
Regarding the Myers-Briggs intuition-sensing spectrum though, it is like introversion-extroversion in that people naturally lie somewhere on the continuum. And if you lean pretty far one way or the other the generalizations will speak more heavily to you or not.
In Myers-Briggs, the Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N) preference describes how individuals perceive and process information. Sensors focus on concrete, tangible details, the present, and practical applications, while intuitives are drawn to abstract concepts, patterns, and possibilities, often focusing on the future.
person