@IdleChater said:
Strange - I don't really think we have failed in our mission. I don't even know what sort of mission I/we are supposed to be on. I don't recall being asked to accept one.And it sounds like Jundo is just trying to sell his book.
Nice one, Jundo.
100% of the proceeds will go to Buddhist and other charities, nothing to me. I would never sell Dharma.
The mission is in the Vow is to save all sentient beings, though numberless, from Dukkha as well as, for us engaged folks in this modern world, war and violence, hunger and poverty, and the like.
Gassho, Jundo
Having an open heart is not simply blind acceptance of what is written. The correct approach is synthesis between what you feel to be true, and the truth of what is written.
Jeroen
@Jeroen said:
keeping your opinion intact.
That's the problem. Your opinion.
My guru told me that true devotion was an open heart. In Buddhist parlance, this is the same as open mind. Clinging to an opinion, keeping it intact, as you say, is not having an open heart. This will present difficulties, making attainment of the path all the more difficult.
And there's the trap!
The very positive environment is ideally created by the sangha.
How do we move towards these seven factors?
Wot no jokes?
lobster
Well said @Lionduck and remember ... You are not a Buddha or anything ... 


lobster
@Jeroen said:
Often when trying to see the wisdom in a piece of writing it is about understanding the boundary where wise text strays into the unwise. You may see a piece of text and feel intuitively that it is wise, and you may see another piece of text and feel nothing towards it. This is the understanding of the heart, and does not bring clarity about the boundaries of wisdom. That requires a deeper seeing, and only then can you untangle what is wise about a certain text.
WTH are you talking about?